Detections
Explore public detection logic contributed by the community across SIEM and rule languages.
1,735 detections
Filters
Last updated
All Time
Detection languages
1,216
144
98
80
59
Contributors
496
324
298
171
55
Categories
20,438
11,829
5,872
5,150
4,864
1,735
Platforms
1,163
328
260
244
163
Products / Services
1,244
200
166
146
138
MITRE Techniques
983
923
765
247
245
CVEs
2
1
IDS Classtypes
68
33
19
10
8
IDS Protocols
90
24
15
15
Detects a multi-stage attack chain originating with a healthcare-themed phishing email (e.g., billing or patient coordination lures) that leads to a link click, followed by a subsequent suspicious user sign-in from a non-managed/non-compliant device for the same recipient. This correlates email threat data, URL click telemetry, and sign-in logs to identify potential credential harvesting.
Detects a multi-stage attack chain originating with a healthcare-themed phishing email (e.g., billing or patient coordination lures) that leads to a link click, followed by a subsequent suspicious user sign-in from a non-managed/non-compliant device for the same recipient. This correlates email threat data, URL click telemetry, and sign-in logs to identify potential credential harvesting.
Detects a multi-stage attack chain originating with a healthcare-themed phishing email (e.g., billing or patient coordination lures) that leads to a link click, followed by a subsequent suspicious user sign-in from a non-managed/non-compliant device for the same recipient. This correlates email threat data, URL click telemetry, and sign-in logs to identify potential credential harvesting.
Detects clicks on sponsored search engine ads that redirect users to Google Cloud Storage (GCS) buckets with names or paths designed to impersonate the 'Ledger' brand. These artifacts are indicative of a malvertising campaign using typosquatted storage paths to deliver malicious payloads or credential harvesting pages.
Detects network navigation to Google Sites pages that match patterns associated with known Ledger-impersonating phishing campaigns. These sites are often reached through redirect chains involving Google Ads, cloud storage, and rotating domains.
This rule detects HTTP GET requests to Vercel subdomains targeting a specific path (/secure.html). This behavior is characteristic of phishing campaigns, specifically those masquerading as RMM-related lures to trick users into providing access codes or credentials.
Detects a suspected ClickFix phishing sequence where a user navigates to a brand-impersonating GitHub organization or repository, followed by a redirection within a short timeframe to a GitHub Pages portal hosting malicious content. The rule also monitors for direct navigation to a known common lure-hosting domain.
This rule detects known malicious activity including network connections to a specific C2 IP address (69.48.229.140), downloading files from specific C2 URLs, the presence of known malicious file hashes (SHA256), and communications involving specific actor-associated email addresses.
This rule detects potential malicious activity where a single sender local-part (username) is observed sending emails across multiple, disparate, and likely compromised domains (such as cPanel or WordPress sites). This behavior is characteristic of large-scale phishing campaigns where a single attacker controls multiple compromised mail relays.
Detects phishing emails themed around Atlantic Council invitations that contain links attempting to lure users into installing iOS configuration profiles, often associated with malicious backdoors like DarkSword, attributed to the Star Blizzard (G1033) threat group.
This rule detects incoming phishing emails that use specific financial or payment-related lures (e.g., 'eft wire transfer', 'invoice receipt') in the subject line or body to entice users into clicking a link that points directly to an executable file, often disguised as a document.
This rule detects incoming phishing emails that use specific financial or payment-related lures (e.g., 'eft wire transfer', 'invoice receipt') in the subject line or body to entice users into clicking a link that points directly to an executable file, often disguised as a document.
This rule detects incoming phishing emails that use specific financial or payment-related lures (e.g., 'eft wire transfer', 'invoice receipt') in the subject line or body to entice users into clicking a link that points directly to an executable file, often disguised as a document.
This rule detects potential quishing (QR code phishing) attempts by identifying emails with one or more image attachments and minimal URL content, followed by a risky user authentication event within a 3-hour window. This behavior is indicative of an attacker attempting to harvest credentials via a malicious QR code that redirects the user to a phishing site.
Detects phishing messages that deliberately mix writing systems/scripts/homoglyphs in the Subject line as ONE corroborating signal within a broader, multi-signal phishing pattern. Hardened against false positives: brand/product tokens (e.g. Microsoft, PayPal) are stripped before the Latin-script check so a lone brand mention in non-Latin correspondence doesn't count as mixed-script; a weighted score (script-mixing=2, homoglyph=3, high-confidence phishing vocabulary=2, threshold=6) means no two of the three signal categories can reach the threshold alone — all three must co-occur before the rule fires.
Detects phishing messages that deliberately mix writing systems/scripts/homoglyphs in the Subject line as ONE corroborating signal within a broader, multi-signal phishing pattern. Hardened against false positives: brand/product tokens (e.g. Microsoft, PayPal) are stripped before the Latin-script check so a lone brand mention in non-Latin correspondence doesn't count as mixed-script; a weighted score (script-mixing=2, homoglyph=3, high-confidence phishing vocabulary=2, threshold=6) means no two of the three signal categories can reach the threshold alone — all three must co-occur before the rule fires.
Detects phishing messages that mix writing systems/scripts/homoglyphs in the Subject line as one corroborating signal within a broader, multi-signal phishing pattern.
Detects phishing messages that deliberately mix writing systems/scripts/homoglyphs in the Subject line as ONE corroborating signal within a broader, multi-signal phishing pattern. Hardened against false positives: brand/product tokens (e.g. Microsoft, PayPal) are stripped before the Latin-script check so a lone brand mention in non-Latin correspondence doesn't count as mixed-script; a weighted score (script-mixing=2, homoglyph=3, high-confidence phishing vocabulary=2, threshold=6) means no two of the three signal categories can reach the threshold alone — all three must co-occur before the rule fires.
Detects phishing messages that deliberately mix writing systems/scripts/homoglyphs in the Subject line as ONE corroborating signal within a broader, multi-signal phishing pattern. Hardened against false positives: brand/product tokens (e.g. Microsoft, PayPal) are stripped before the Latin-script check so a lone brand mention in non-Latin correspondence doesn't count as mixed-script; a weighted score (script-mixing=2, homoglyph=3, high-confidence phishing vocabulary=2, threshold=6) means no two of the three signal categories can reach the threshold alone — all three must co-occur before the rule fires.
Detects phishing messages that deliberately mix writing systems/scripts/homoglyphs in the Subject line as ONE corroborating signal within a broader, multi-signal phishing pattern. Hardened against false positives: brand/product tokens (e.g. Microsoft, PayPal) are stripped before the Latin-script check so a lone brand mention in non-Latin correspondence doesn't count as mixed-script; a weighted score (script-mixing=2, homoglyph=3, high-confidence phishing vocabulary=2, threshold=6) means no two of the three signal categories can reach the threshold alone — all three must co-occur before the rule fires.
Detects phishing emails that mix writing systems or scripts in the Subject line, combined with phishing vocabulary.
Page 8 of 83