Detections
Explore public detection logic contributed by the community across SIEM and rule languages.
1,588 detections
Filters
Last updated
All Time
Detection languages
830
199
132
116
107
Contributors
608
289
249
88
63
Categories
20,440
11,814
5,871
5,145
4,864
1,588
Platforms
1,255
461
295
76
68
Products / Services
530
382
139
113
85
MITRE Techniques
629
565
504
437
297
CVEs
5
4
3
3
3
IDS Classtypes
5
2
2
1
IDS Protocols
5
3
2
Detects the SectopRAT shellcode execution stage by identifying the concurrent access of a specific encrypted database file (Activation.Desktop.db) and the loading of a malicious DLL (stp_aim_x64_vc15.dll) on the same device within a 5-minute window. This behavior suggests the decryption and execution of shellcode via DLL callback abuse.
Detects instances where machine learning runtime processes (e.g., Python, torch-model-loader) load serialized model files (e.g., .pkl, .joblib, .pth) and subsequently spawn suspicious child processes like command shells, scripting engines, or download utilities. This behavior is indicative of arbitrary code execution via unsafe deserialization of a malicious model artifact.
Detects high-volume outbound transfers of sensitive machine learning artifacts, such as model files, training datasets, and model registries, to unauthorized external destinations like personal email or unmanaged cloud storage. This behavior is indicative of potential intellectual property theft.
Detects a sequence of potentially malicious activity involving the bulk reading or downloading of sensitive AI-related artifacts (model files, datasets), followed by the staging of these files into a compressed archive, and finally an outbound network transfer to an external IP address. This behavior pattern is indicative of data exfiltration of intellectual property.
Detects processes querying registry keys or accessing file paths associated with common virtualization and sandbox environments (e.g., VMware, VirtualBox, Hyper-V, Sandboxie). This behavior is often indicative of malware attempting to identify if it is running in an analysis or sandbox environment to evade detection.
Detects bulk file access or modifications involving sensitive files such as certificates (.pfx, .p12, .pem, .key), password manager vaults (.kdbx, .kdb), and files containing keywords related to credentials or logins. This behavior is indicative of an adversary staging or exfiltrating sensitive security material for further credential access.
Detects the creation of a Volume Shadow Copy followed by an attempt to access or copy sensitive files, specifically the NTDS.dit database or the SYSTEM registry hive, from that shadow copy. This behavior is indicative of an attempt to perform offline credential theft.
Detects unauthorized processes, excluding standard web browsers, accessing sensitive browser files such as Login Data, Cookies, Web Data, and Local State. This activity is indicative of credential harvesting malware attempting to steal authentication cookies, saved passwords, or browser profiles.
Detects the loading of the 'WbElevation.dll' module associated with SectopRAT, followed by suspicious access to browser, email, or cryptocurrency wallet credential stores within a 10-minute window on the same device.
This rule detects potential SectopRAT loader activity by identifying non-.NET-native processes accessing 'pool.db' in the ProgramData directory followed by the immediate loading of .NET CLR libraries (clr.dll or mscoreei.dll). This pattern is indicative of reflective loading of a decrypted .NET payload into memory within a target process.
Detects anomalous file staging activity combined with keyword-matched file access or suspicious Steam application launches, characteristic of the Rapuncel (BoryptGrab) malware's credential and crypto-wallet harvesting routine.
Detects Node.js or Python processes exhibiting suspicious behavior consistent with information-stealing malware (such as BeaverTail or InvisibleFerret). The rule monitors for these processes accessing sensitive files, including browser credentials, cookies, browser extension wallet settings, cryptocurrency wallet files, and various identification document image types, followed by the execution of archiving utilities (e.g., zip, rar, 7z) to stage the collected data for exfiltration.
Detects suspicious file create or write operations within the domain SYSVOL Policies directory. This pattern is commonly associated with attackers attempting to deploy malicious payloads, such as ransom notes or configuration changes, via Group Policy Objects (GPO). The rule monitors Windows Event ID 4663 to identify unauthorized modification attempts by non-system accounts.
Detects the use of legitimate data transfer utilities (s5cmd, rclone) configured to exfiltrate sensitive document types (.doc, .pdf, .sql, etc.) to S3-compatible cloud storage. The rule correlates this activity with recent access to files containing sensitive credentials or configuration data, a pattern observed in double-extortion campaigns.
Detects the use of legitimate data transfer utilities (s5cmd, rclone) configured to exfiltrate sensitive document types (.doc, .pdf, .sql, etc.) to S3-compatible cloud storage. The rule correlates this activity with recent access to files containing sensitive credentials or configuration data, a pattern observed in double-extortion campaigns.
Detects instances where AI developer tools or IDE assistants (e.g., Claude, Copilot, Cursor) execute data collection commands (such as directory traversal or archiving) followed by or concurrent with the bulk access of sensitive files (credentials, configuration files) or personal user data.
Detects an suspicious progression of activities originating from identified AI assistant/agent processes. The rule monitors for a chain of behaviors occurring within a 15-minute window: execution of an AI agent/tool, followed by host discovery (network/system enumeration), access to sensitive local credential files, archival of data, and outbound network communication to common file-sharing/exfiltration platforms.
Detects an suspicious progression of activities originating from identified AI assistant/agent processes. The rule monitors for a chain of behaviors occurring within a 15-minute window: execution of an AI agent/tool, followed by host discovery (network/system enumeration), access to sensitive local credential files, archival of data, and outbound network communication to common file-sharing/exfiltration platforms.
Detects anomalous, rapid enumeration of system, network, process, and software configuration settings by AI coding assistant processes (e.g., Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT). This behavior often signifies an AI agent being coerced or configured to perform environment discovery or credential gathering, indicating potential compromise or abuse of the LLM-integrated development environment.
Detects anomalous AI-assisted activity where multiple processes (specifically AI developer tools) appear to be chaining operations by writing to and reading from shared local directories (e.g., 'handoff', 'artifacts') followed by network requests to known AI service APIs. This pattern may indicate automated task chaining or unauthorized exfiltration of context/code to AI platforms.
Detects anomalous AI-assisted activity where multiple processes (specifically AI developer tools) appear to be chaining operations by writing to and reading from shared local directories (e.g., 'handoff', 'artifacts') followed by network requests to known AI service APIs. This pattern may indicate automated task chaining or unauthorized exfiltration of context/code to AI platforms.
Page 9 of 76