Detections

Explore public detection logic contributed by the community across SIEM and rule languages.

455 detections

Detects users who modify their MFA settings (registration/update/delete) and subsequently perform privileged actions (such as adding role members or service principal credentials) within a short timeframe, while simultaneously observed active in communication applications like Teams, Zoom, or Webex. This behavior is indicative of potential account takeover where an adversary modifies authentication methods to gain persistent access, followed by privilege escalation.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
005
This rule detects potential token theft or MFA bypass by correlating successful MFA-satisfied interactive sign-ins with subsequent non-interactive sign-ins (token refreshes) occurring within a 60-minute window from different IP addresses for the same user. This pattern is indicative of an attacker stealing a session token (e.g., via session cookie theft or AiTM phishing) and using it to authenticate from a different location.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
002
Detects instances where a user successfully authenticates using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) from one location, followed by a Single-Factor Authentication (SFA) logon from a different location within a 10-minute window. This behavior is indicative of potential session hijacking or session cookie theft where an attacker reuses an authenticated session or manipulates the authentication flow to bypass MFA requirements.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
302
This rule identifies potential session hijacking or session replay attacks by detecting successful logins from the same user account using the same User-Agent string but originating from different source IP addresses within a one-hour window. This behavior is indicative of an attacker replaying stolen session cookies, effectively bypassing Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) requirements associated with initial authentication.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
807
Detects a successful multifactor authentication followed within minutes by another successful sign-in for the same account from a different IP address and user agent. This pattern can indicate an adversary has bypassed MFA, potentially through techniques like AiTM phishing, and is attempting to use the compromised session.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
209
Detects successful sign-ins using legacy authentication protocols (e.g., IMAP, POP3, SMTP AUTH, ROPC) for user accounts that are in scope of a Conditional Access policy requiring multi-factor authentication (MFA). Legacy protocols do not support modern authentication flows, effectively bypassing configured MFA requirements and increasing the risk of credential-based attacks.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
Bharat Cyber Guardians
4 months ago
404
Detects successful sign-ins using legacy authentication protocols (e.g., IMAP, POP3, SMTP AUTH, ROPC) for user accounts that are in scope of a Conditional Access policy requiring multi-factor authentication (MFA). Legacy protocols do not support modern authentication flows, effectively bypassing configured MFA requirements and increasing the risk of credential-based attacks.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
304
Detects sign-in events where Conditional Access was not applied for Microsoft Graph access using low-privileged client IDs known to trigger hidden CA exclusions. Tokens issued with only single-factor authentication to Graph indicate exploitation of the hidden scope exclusion behavior introduced when any exclusion is added to an 'All resources' CA policy (CVE-2025-0309). Additionally, this rule identifies audit log events for Conditional Access policy modifications that add exclusions.
avatar
Ethan Andrews@eandrews
avatar
Federal Signal Detections
4 months ago
207
Detects one web session posting username, password, and MFA or one-time-code form fields through the same intermediary host. This behavior is indicative of an Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) attack, where an attacker intercepts and relays authentication requests, including multi-factor authentication (MFA) codes, to gain unauthorized access.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
308
Detects a non-interactive sign-in using an existing session shortly after the user completes interactive MFA, which can indicate stolen token replay. This rule identifies scenarios where a user successfully completes an interactive multi-factor authentication (MFA) sign-in, and then, within a short time frame (1800 seconds or 30 minutes), a non-interactive sign-in occurs for the same user and session ID. This pattern is indicative of a stolen session token being replayed by an attacker, bypassing subsequent MFA prompts.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
208
Detects MFA authentication success from one IP address followed immediately by a session access attempt from a different IP address. This pattern is characteristic of Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) phishing attacks, such as those using EvilProxy, Evilginx2, or similar phishing-as-a-service (PhaaS) platforms, where an adversary proxies the authentication flow to capture session tokens.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
004
Detects a potential Conditional Access bypass, often associated with Storm-2372, where a device is registered and immediately followed by a PRT or deviceToken-authenticated sign-in to sensitive cloud applications within one hour. This behavior indicates the usage of non-TPM-attested 'phantom' devices to circumvent device-based security requirements.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
005
Detects sign-ins by Global Administrators using a Temporary Access Pass (TAP) to the Azure Portal. This activity is indicative of potential credential abuse, especially in cross-tenant scenarios, as TAP can bypass MFA. The rule identifies instances where a Global Administrator role is assigned or where a user with 'globaladmin' in their UPN signs in with a TAP.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
205
Detects high volumes of sign-in failures or instances where Conditional Access policies are not applied, particularly for unregistered devices, indicating potential attempts to bypass security controls or perform brute-force attacks against cloud authentication.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
301
This rule detects potential Conditional Access bypass attempts where a Primary Refresh Token (PRT) is exchanged for an Azure Active Directory (AAD) Graph token. The detection specifically looks for successful sign-ins to 'Windows Azure Active Directory' or 'Microsoft Graph' resources from devices marked as 'compliant' but with 'Unknown' ownership or no prior device registration history in Audit Logs. This could indicate an adversary using a compromised PRT on an unregistered or untrusted device to gain access to resources that should be protected by Conditional Access policies.
avatar
Bryant Smith@flowstate
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
216
This rule detects attempts to bypass Conditional Access policies by exchanging a Primary Refresh Token (PRT) for an Azure Active Directory (AAD) Graph token on a device that is either of 'Unknown' ownership or lacks a check-in history, despite being marked as compliant. This behavior could indicate an adversary attempting to gain unauthorized access to resources by leveraging a compromised PRT on an unmanaged or suspicious device, circumventing Conditional Access controls.
avatar
Bryant Smith@flowstate
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
216
Detects session hijacking consistent with Browser-in-the-Middle (BitM) attacks like Bluekit PhaaS, where an attacker captures an authenticated session token. The rule identifies instances where a successful MFA-protected login event is immediately followed by a session reuse event from a different IP address or network location, which is indicative of the attacker utilizing the intercepted session.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
103
Detects successful sign-ins to specific Azure AD applications known to bypass Conditional Access policies, where Conditional Access was not applied. This could indicate an attempt to circumvent security controls.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
Bharat Cyber Guardians
4 months ago
106
Detects stolen session token reuse to bypass MFA by correlating a successful SSO/VPN login from one IP with a subsequent successful login from a different IP using the same user agent context, or a user-agent change between sessions for the same user within a short window. Targets access broker technique where infostealer-harvested session cookies are replayed from different source IPs.
avatar
nomit vyas@xoxo
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
203
Detects stolen session token reuse to bypass MFA by correlating a successful SSO/VPN login from one IP with a subsequent successful login from a different IP using the same user agent context, or a user-agent change between sessions for the same user within a short window. Targets access broker technique where infostealer-harvested session cookies are replayed from different source IPs.
avatar
nomit vyas@xoxo
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
003
Detects successful non-interactive token acquisitions using specific Microsoft first-party application IDs known to bypass Entra Conditional Access Policies through Nested App Authentication (NAA/BroCI). The detection specifically targets sign-ins to the Microsoft Graph resource.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
005
Page 16 of 22