Detections

Explore public detection logic contributed by the community across SIEM and rule languages.

455 detections

Detects a Google account completing an OAuth or MFA challenge and then generating a new session from a different client fingerprint (different source IP or user agent) within a 10-minute window. This behavior can indicate a session hijack or an adversary bypassing MFA.
avatar
Daniel Jeremiah@daniyyell
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
007
Detects a non-interactive sign-in using an existing session shortly after the user completes interactive MFA, which can indicate stolen token replay. This rule identifies scenarios where a user successfully completes an interactive multi-factor authentication (MFA) sign-in, and then, within a short time frame (1800 seconds or 30 minutes), a non-interactive sign-in occurs for the same user and session ID. This pattern is indicative of a stolen session token being replayed by an attacker, bypassing subsequent MFA prompts.
avatar
Daniel Jeremiah@daniyyell
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
107
Detects instances where a user successfully authenticates from a mobile device (Android or iPhone) that exhibits a geographic mismatch (geo_country vs registered_country), and subsequently performs a sensitive credential or MFA-related action (enrollment or reset) from a different device within one hour. This pattern is indicative of a potential session hijacking or credential compromise where an attacker attempts to establish persistence by enrolling their own MFA device.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
000
Detects anomalous Azure AD device registration events where device metadata is inconsistent, suggesting impersonation. The rule flags Linux hosts masquerading as Windows, non-Windows devices claiming AzureAD trust type, or the use of zeroed OS versions (0.0.0.0). High-frequency registrations (3+ devices per user in 30 minutes) correlate with known AADInternals-based attacks used by threat actor Storm-2372 to bypass Conditional Access policies.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
003
Detects registration of new MFA devices potentially for authentication bypass
avatar
Darshan Thummar@Mighty
avatar
Detections.ai Community
5 months ago
9048
Detects suspected Browser-in-the-Middle (AiTM) activity by identifying successful multi-factor authentication followed by session activity from a different source IP address or with a different user-agent string within a 10-minute window, suggesting token theft or session hijacking.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
002
Detects a session issued through browser MFA and subsequently used through a non-interactive, mobile, or command-line client. This behavior is indicative of an adversary potentially using a stolen session token to bypass multi-factor authentication.
avatar
Daniel Jeremiah@daniyyell
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
106
Detects successful sign-ins to specific Azure AD applications known to bypass Conditional Access policies, where Conditional Access was not applied. This could indicate an attempt to circumvent security controls.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
004
Detects a new phone, authenticator application, FIDO key, or passkey registered after account recovery activity, which can establish attacker-controlled multifactor authentication.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
006
Detects IMAP, POP, SMTP AUTH, or other legacy authentication activity soon after the same account completes modern MFA. This could indicate an adversary bypassing MFA by using legacy protocols after successfully authenticating with modern MFA.
avatar
Daniel Jeremiah@daniyyell
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
105
Detects successful authentications where a Temporary Access Pass (TAP) was used as the primary authentication method. TAPs bypass standard password and MFA requirements, and their usage outside of expected scenarios (like onboarding or account recovery) could indicate an adversary bypassing authentication mechanisms.
avatar
Ethan Andrews@eandrews
avatar
Federal Signal Detections
4 months ago
3011
Detects Python executing a web-administration exploit with valid credential input and explicit two-factor bypass logic, matching the AI-assisted semantic trust-flaw exploitation described by GTIG.
avatar
Daniel Jeremiah@daniyyell
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
106
This rule detects EvilTokens device code OAuth phishing by identifying rapid, repeated POST requests to the /common/oauth2/token endpoint with a device_code grant and authorization_pending responses, followed by a successful token issuance and sign-in without an MFA claim. This pattern is consistent with EvilTokens session harvesting.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
102
Detects a new phone, authenticator application, FIDO key, or passkey registered after account recovery activity, which can establish attacker-controlled multifactor authentication.
avatar
Daniel Jeremiah@daniyyell
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
105
Detects successful non-interactive token acquisitions using specific Microsoft first-party application IDs known to bypass Entra Conditional Access Policies through Nested App Authentication (NAA/BroCI). The detection specifically targets sign-ins to the Microsoft Graph resource.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
Bharat Cyber Guardians
4 months ago
003
Detects Self-Service Password Reset (SSPR) activity followed by the deletion of authentication methods within a 1-hour window. This sequence of events can indicate an attacker attempting to maintain access or bypass multi-factor authentication after gaining initial access to an account, potentially executed by threat groups like Storm-2949.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
509
This rule detects the creation of Okta API tokens with broad administrative scopes (okta.users.manage, okta.factors.manage, or okta.apps.manage) by the same user multiple times within a one-hour window. This behavior can indicate an attempt to establish persistent access or bypass multi-factor authentication.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
Bharat Cyber Guardians
4 months ago
0011
Detects one web session posting username, password, and MFA or one-time-code form fields through the same intermediary host. This behavior is indicative of an Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) attack, where an attacker intercepts and relays authentication requests, including multi-factor authentication (MFA) codes, to gain unauthorized access.
avatar
Daniel Jeremiah@daniyyell
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
203
Detects a successful multifactor authentication followed within minutes by another successful sign-in for the same account from a different IP address and user agent. This pattern can indicate an adversary has bypassed MFA, potentially through techniques like AiTM phishing, and is attempting to use the compromised session.
avatar
Daniel Jeremiah@daniyyell
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
103
Identifies login_verification events completing in less than 1 second, strongly indicative of automated AiTM proxying.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
206
Detects sign-ins to Entra ID using Axios, Undici, or Node-Fetch user agents, which are fingerprints of Tycoon 2FA attacks. This rule helps identify potential multi-factor authentication bypass attempts.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
006
Page 17 of 22