Detections
Explore public detection logic contributed by the community across SIEM and rule languages.
5,879 detections
Filters
Last updated
All Time
Detection languages
2,954
1,378
313
289
239
Contributors
1,807
1,529
1,304
180
173
Categories
20,460
11,847
5,879
5,158
4,866
Platforms
3,747
1,857
1,076
782
160
Products / Services
2,241
1,434
1,273
746
582
MITRE Techniques
2,448
2,151
1,129
937
790
CVEs
19
15
9
7
5
IDS Classtypes
834
334
94
23
20
IDS Protocols
689
276
235
117
23
Detects the execution of MSBuild.exe initiated by PowerShell involving specific suspicious file names or extensions (.csproj, .xml) or project naming conventions, followed immediately (within 15 minutes) by an external network connection from the MSBuild process to a specific suspicious IP address or non-standard port.
Detects instances where the Windows Package Manager (winget.exe) initiates potentially suspicious child processes such as command shells or administrative tools, and correlates this activity with network connections originating from those child processes.
Detects the use of nodejs.exe to initiate external network tunnels to known tunneling services like pinggy.io or generic tunnels using common tunnel configuration flags.
Detects a specific sandbox/analysis evasion pattern associated with the QUICAgent malware, which involves a tight hashing loop and a randomized 100-600ms delay occurring between process initiation and the first outbound network connection.
Detects anomalous Telnet (TCP port 23) traffic associated with Mirai-variant botnet propagation, such as scanning for new targets or inbound compromise attempts, often following cPanel/WHM vulnerabilities.
Detects a suspicious execution chain where a browser process makes a network connection, followed shortly by a direct execution of command-line tools (powershell.exe, mshta.exe, or cmd.exe) from the Windows explorer.exe process (e.g., via the Run dialog). This behavior is characteristic of 'ClickFix' social engineering attacks where users are tricked into copying and pasting malicious commands from a web page directly into their local environment.
Detects a two-stage activity: first, the potential unauthorized reading or access of LLM provider API keys from files, environment variables, or command-line arguments; and second, the subsequent use of those same credentials to authenticate to LLM provider APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure, Bedrock) from a different, unrecognized source IP address, indicating potential credential theft and session hijacking.
Detects a two-stage activity: first, the potential unauthorized reading or access of LLM provider API keys from files, environment variables, or command-line arguments; and second, the subsequent use of those same credentials to authenticate to LLM provider APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure, Bedrock) from a different, unrecognized source IP address, indicating potential credential theft and session hijacking.
Detects anomalous, chained execution patterns initiated by AI agents integrated with Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. The rule identifies a multi-stage sequence involving the invocation of browser automation tools followed by shell execution and subsequent outbound network activity, potentially indicating an AI-driven attack chaining filesystem, shell, or cloud-API access in an unauthorized manner.
Detects endpoint behavior consistent with AI-assisted exploit development, characterized by the execution of reverse engineering and vulnerability research tools (e.g., IDA Pro, Ghidra, AFL) interleaved with frequent outbound network connections to LLM APIs, followed by the local compilation of a new executable or DLL.
Detects coordinated activity patterns across multiple distinct tenant environments within a one-hour window. The rule looks for shared infrastructure (C2 domains), malicious tool hashes, or specific agentic-CLI command line signatures (e.g., related to orchestration, reconnaissance, or exfiltration) that suggest an AI-orchestrated actor or automated attack campaign affecting multiple organizations simultaneously.
Detects anomalous, chained execution patterns initiated by AI agents integrated with Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. The rule identifies a multi-stage sequence involving the invocation of browser automation tools followed by shell execution and subsequent outbound network activity, potentially indicating an AI-driven attack chaining filesystem, shell, or cloud-API access in an unauthorized manner.
Detects anomalous, chained execution patterns initiated by AI agents integrated with Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. The rule identifies a multi-stage sequence involving the invocation of browser automation tools followed by shell execution and subsequent outbound network activity, potentially indicating an AI-driven attack chaining filesystem, shell, or cloud-API access in an unauthorized manner.
Detects anomalous outbound network connections initiated by security and developer tooling (Trivy, Checkmarx, LiteLLM, Telnyx). This behavior is consistent with supply-chain attacks, such as those attributed to the UNC6780/TeamPCP threat group, where compromised tooling is leveraged to exfiltrate sensitive cloud credentials or API keys to external, non-vendor infrastructure.
Detects outbound HTTPS connections to major generative AI inference endpoints originating from non-browser, non-development tool processes at regular intervals. This activity is indicative of beaconing behavior, where malware (specifically families like LAMEHUG) leverages LLM APIs for dynamic command generation, payload obfuscation, or C2 instruction retrieval, bypassing traditional security controls.
Detects endpoint behavior consistent with AI-assisted exploit development, characterized by the execution of reverse engineering and vulnerability research tools (e.g., IDA Pro, Ghidra, AFL) interleaved with frequent outbound network connections to LLM APIs, followed by the local compilation of a new executable or DLL.
Detects coordinated activity patterns across multiple distinct tenant environments within a one-hour window. The rule looks for shared infrastructure (C2 domains), malicious tool hashes, or specific agentic-CLI command line signatures (e.g., related to orchestration, reconnaissance, or exfiltration) that suggest an AI-orchestrated actor or automated attack campaign affecting multiple organizations simultaneously.
Detects anomalous, high-volume file access by a single process, followed by local file compression or archiving, and subsequent outbound data transfer to a non-internal IP address. This pattern is characteristic of automated agents (like those used in the GTG-1002/Anthropic AI-orchestrated campaigns) performing rapid data triage and staging for exfiltration.
Detects anomalous activity from IDEs or AI coding assistant extension host processes (e.g., VS Code, Cursor, JetBrains). The rule alerts when these processes spawn children that access sensitive local credential files, perform network connections to non-standard/unexpected domains, or modify critical CI/CD build script configuration files, which is indicative of a supply chain compromise within the developer environment.
Detects anomalous child process spawning from common web browsers or productivity applications (e.g., Office, Acrobat) on hosts that have recently communicated with known LLM or code-generation APIs. This behavioral correlation is intended to identify the potential execution of AI-generated exploit code.
Detects potential runtime polymorphic malware that modifies its own executable or script content while simultaneously communicating with generative AI or LLM API endpoints. This behavior indicates an adversary using LLMs to regenerate obfuscated code or mutate malware signatures dynamically at runtime.
Page 63 of 280