Detections

Explore public detection logic contributed by the community across SIEM and rule languages.

665 detections

Detects process injection into ImagingDevices.exe, a technique observed in the 'Illusory Wishes' campaign to evade detection. The threat actor used trojanized versions of Element and VLC to inject shellcode into this legitimate Windows process.
avatar
Aaron Mog@AaronMogS2S
avatar
Detections.ai Community
1 year ago
0122
Detects suspicious driver loads indicative of rootkits or BYOVD attacks. Flags unsigned/non-Microsoft drivers loaded from temp paths or by unusual processes. Targets random-named drivers (e.g., 'a1b2c3.sys'), known vulnerable drivers, and system driver impersonators.
avatar
Awais Munir@iawais
avatar
Detections.ai Community
1 year ago
5179
KQL Query from file: Sentinel All-In-One UPN ThreatHunt
avatar
Steven Lim@KQLWizard
avatar
SlimKQL
1 year ago
5076
KQL Query from file: CVE-2025-32705 Out-of-bounds Read Detection
avatar
Steven Lim@KQLWizard
avatar
SlimKQL
1 year ago
8053
Detects process access requests from hacktool processes based on their default image name
Yamato Security Hayabusa@YamatoSecurityHayabusa
avatar
Yamato Security Hayabusa Rules
1 year ago
1024
Detects LSASS process access for potential credential dumping by a Python-like tool such as LaZagne or Pypykatz.
Yamato Security Hayabusa@YamatoSecurityHayabusa
avatar
Yamato Security Hayabusa Rules
1 year ago
0024
Detects LSASS process access by LaZagne for credential dumping.
Yamato Security Hayabusa@YamatoSecurityHayabusa
avatar
Yamato Security Hayabusa Rules
1 year ago
0021
Detects process access request to uncommon target images with a "PROCESS_ALL_ACCESS" access mask.
Yamato Security Hayabusa@YamatoSecurityHayabusa
avatar
Yamato Security Hayabusa Rules
1 year ago
0020
Detects the access to processes by other suspicious processes which have reflectively loaded libraries in their memory space.
An example is SilentTrinity C2 behaviour. Generally speaking, when Sysmon EventID 10 cannot reference a stack call to a dll loaded from disk (the standard way),
it will display "UNKNOWN" as the module name. Usually this means the stack call points to a module that was reflectively loaded in memory.
Adding to this, it is not common to see such few calls in the stack (ntdll.dll --> kernelbase.dll --> unknown) which essentially means that
most of the functions required by the process to execute certain routines are already present in memory, not requiring any calls to external libraries.
The latter should also be considered suspicious.
Yamato Security Hayabusa@YamatoSecurityHayabusa
avatar
Yamato Security Hayabusa Rules
1 year ago
0014
Detects potential exploitation of remote code execution vulnerability CVE-2025-33053
by looking for process access that involves legitimate Windows executables (iediagcmd.exe, CustomShellHost.exe)
accessing suspicious executables hosted on WebDAV shares. This indicates an attacker may be exploiting
Process.Start() search order manipulation to execute malicious code from attacker-controlled WebDAV servers
instead of legitimate system binaries. The vulnerability allows unauthorized code execution through
external control of file names or paths via WebDAV.
Yamato Security Hayabusa@YamatoSecurityHayabusa
avatar
Yamato Security Hayabusa Rules
1 year ago
0013
Detects a typical pattern of a CobaltStrike BOF which inject into other processes
Yamato Security Hayabusa@YamatoSecurityHayabusa
avatar
Yamato Security Hayabusa Rules
1 year ago
0010
Detects process LSASS memory dump using Mimikatz, NanoDump, Invoke-Mimikatz, Procdump or Taskmgr based on the CallTrace pointing to ntdll.dll, dbghelp.dll or dbgcore.dll for win10, server2016 and up.
Yamato Security Hayabusa@YamatoSecurityHayabusa
avatar
Yamato Security Hayabusa Rules
1 year ago
009
Detects when a process tries to access the memory of svchost to potentially dump credentials.
Yamato Security Hayabusa@YamatoSecurityHayabusa
avatar
Yamato Security Hayabusa Rules
1 year ago
009
Detects LSASS process access by pypykatz for credential dumping.
Yamato Security Hayabusa@YamatoSecurityHayabusa
avatar
Yamato Security Hayabusa Rules
1 year ago
008
Detects suspicious access to the "svchost" process such as that used by Invoke-Phantom to kill the thread of the Windows event logging service.
Yamato Security Hayabusa@YamatoSecurityHayabusa
avatar
Yamato Security Hayabusa Rules
1 year ago
008
Detects processes requesting access to LSASS memory via suspicious access masks. This is typical for credentials dumping tools
Yamato Security Hayabusa@YamatoSecurityHayabusa
avatar
Yamato Security Hayabusa Rules
1 year ago
007
Detects a process access to verclsid.exe that injects shellcode from a Microsoft Office application / VBA macro
Yamato Security Hayabusa@YamatoSecurityHayabusa
avatar
Yamato Security Hayabusa Rules
1 year ago
007
Detects process access requests to the LSASS process with specific call trace calls and access masks.
This behaviour is expressed by many credential dumping tools such as Mimikatz, NanoDump, Invoke-Mimikatz, Procdump and even the Taskmgr dumping feature.
Yamato Security Hayabusa@YamatoSecurityHayabusa
avatar
Yamato Security Hayabusa Rules
1 year ago
007
Detects various indicators of Microsoft Connection Manager Profile Installer execution
Yamato Security Hayabusa@YamatoSecurityHayabusa
avatar
Yamato Security Hayabusa Rules
1 year ago
107
Detects potential shellcode injection as seen used by tools such as Metasploit's migrate and Empire's psinject.
Yamato Security Hayabusa@YamatoSecurityHayabusa
avatar
Yamato Security Hayabusa Rules
1 year ago
007
Expanding on DeviceEvents output with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rule descriptions.
The ActionType values of the ASR events already explain what rule was matched and if it was audited or blocked.
However, it could still be useful to have a more human-friendly description in the results.
Also, this query is a good example for how you could define your own lookup tables and join with them.
The events in the DeviceEvents table contain a GUID for the various ASR rules rather than a full description of the rule.
This query will create a table which has the description for each ASR rule as per https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-exploit-guard/enable-attack-surface-reduction.
This table is then joined to the output of a query against the DeviceEvents table and shows a summary count of the events by the newly defined description.
This query shows the ability to use joins and custom dimension tables.
See https://docs.loganalytics.io/docs/Language-Reference/Tabular-operators/join-operator for more information on the join syntax.
For more questions on this query, feel free to ping @FlyingBlueMonki on twitter or mattegen@microsoft.com via email.
First lets start by creating a table of the rule descriptions to rule guids.
Azure Sentinel@AzureSentinel
avatar
AzureSentinel
1 year ago
4042
Page 28 of 32