Detections
Explore public detection logic contributed by the community across SIEM and rule languages.
5 detections
Filters
Last updated
All Time
Detection languages
2
2
1
Contributors
2
1
1
1
Categories
4
4
1
1
1
Platforms
5
Products / Services
2
2
1
1
1
MITRE Techniques
18,115
15,635
12,576
8,388
6,215
Detects use of Forfiles for indirect command execution to evade detection
Detects use of Forfiles for indirect command execution to evade detection
Detects when an attacker attempts to modify an existing scheduled task to execute a payload from suspicious locations. This technique allows attackers to bypass detection mechanisms that primarily focus on the creation of new scheduled tasks, by instead altering a legitimate task to include their malicious code.
Detects suspicious commands written to the RunMRU registry key. This is a characteristic of the "ClickFix" social engineering technique, where a user is tricked into copying a malicious command and executing it via the Windows Run dialog (Win+R). This technique is notably used by Lumma Stealer affiliates.
The analytic detects the execution of programs initiated by `forfiles.exe`. This command is typically used to run commands on multiple files, often within batch scripts. The detection leverages data from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents, focusing on process creation events where `forfiles.exe` is the parent process. This activity is significant because `forfiles.exe` can be exploited to bypass command line execution protections, making it a potential vector for malicious activity. If confirmed malicious, this could allow attackers to execute arbitrary commands, potentially leading to unauthorized access or further system compromise.
