Detections
Explore public detection logic contributed by the community across SIEM and rule languages.
15 detections
Filters
Last updated
All Time
Detection languages
6
5
2
1
1
Contributors
6
3
2
1
1
Categories
10
8
6
5
3
Platforms
11
4
3
Products / Services
5
5
4
2
2
MITRE Techniques
18,115
15,635
12,576
8,388
6,215
CVEs
1
IDS Classtypes
2
IDS Protocols
2
Detects anomalous child process spawning from common web browsers or productivity applications (e.g., Office, Acrobat) on hosts that have recently communicated with known LLM or code-generation APIs. This behavioral correlation is intended to identify the potential execution of AI-generated exploit code.
Detects endpoint behavior consistent with AI-assisted exploit development, characterized by the execution of reverse engineering and vulnerability research tools (e.g., IDA Pro, Ghidra, AFL) interleaved with frequent outbound network connections to LLM APIs, followed by the local compilation of a new executable or DLL.
Detects endpoint behavior consistent with AI-assisted exploit development, characterized by the execution of reverse engineering and vulnerability research tools (e.g., IDA Pro, Ghidra, AFL) interleaved with frequent outbound network connections to LLM APIs, followed by the local compilation of a new executable or DLL.
Detects anomalous child process spawning from common web browsers or productivity applications (e.g., Office, Acrobat) on hosts that have recently communicated with known LLM or code-generation APIs. This behavioral correlation is intended to identify the potential execution of AI-generated exploit code.
Detects endpoint behavior consistent with AI-assisted exploit development, characterized by the execution of reverse engineering and vulnerability research tools (e.g., IDA Pro, Ghidra, AFL) interleaved with frequent outbound network connections to LLM APIs, followed by the local compilation of a new executable or DLL.
Detects repeated process execution events associated with Acronis backup plugins for cPanel, WHM, or Plesk within a 15-minute window. This behavior is consistent with automated exploitation attempts, specifically referencing CVE-2026-87886, which target these backup management plugins to achieve privilege escalation or unauthorized system access.
This rule detects events generated by Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules in either Audit or Block mode.
(**Toggle by commenting out line 94/95. Default is both Audit & Block**).
It covers all 19 ASR rules by matching ActionType patterns or falling back to GUIDs found in AdditionalFields. The rule extracts the friendly name of the ASR rule, the mode (Audit/Block), and relevant process information.
This rule is especially noisy when ran over an entire environment. It's recommended to scope using Audit/Block, Machine Group, and filtering to the rules you want by commenting others out.
(**Toggle by commenting out line 94/95. Default is both Audit & Block**).
It covers all 19 ASR rules by matching ActionType patterns or falling back to GUIDs found in AdditionalFields. The rule extracts the friendly name of the ASR rule, the mode (Audit/Block), and relevant process information.
This rule is especially noisy when ran over an entire environment. It's recommended to scope using Audit/Block, Machine Group, and filtering to the rules you want by commenting others out.
This rule detects the download of files from raw.githubusercontent.com that contain keywords commonly associated with exploit frameworks, CVEs, or Proof-of-Concepts (PoCs). It specifically looks for 'exploit', 'cve-[0-9]{4}', or 'poc' within the HTTP URI. This activity could indicate an attacker downloading tools or modules for exploitation during resource development or initial access phases.
This rule detects the download of potential proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit code for CVEs. It specifically looks for HTTP responses containing a URI that matches the pattern 'CVE-YYYY-NNNN' (e.g., CVE-2023-1234) and also contains the word 'exploit' in the file data. This combination suggests that a client on the internal network is downloading code related to a known vulnerability, which could be for research, testing, or malicious purposes.
KQL Query
Expanding on DeviceEvents output with Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rule descriptions.
The ActionType values of the ASR events already explain what rule was matched and if it was audited or blocked.
However, it could still be useful to have a more human-friendly description in the results.
Also, this query is a good example for how you could define your own lookup tables and join with them.
The events in the DeviceEvents table contain a GUID for the various ASR rules rather than a full description of the rule.
This query will create a table which has the description for each ASR rule as per https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-exploit-guard/enable-attack-surface-reduction.
This table is then joined to the output of a query against the DeviceEvents table and shows a summary count of the events by the newly defined description.
This query shows the ability to use joins and custom dimension tables.
See https://docs.loganalytics.io/docs/Language-Reference/Tabular-operators/join-operator for more information on the join syntax.
For more questions on this query, feel free to ping @FlyingBlueMonki on twitter or mattegen@microsoft.com via email.
First lets start by creating a table of the rule descriptions to rule guids.
The ActionType values of the ASR events already explain what rule was matched and if it was audited or blocked.
However, it could still be useful to have a more human-friendly description in the results.
Also, this query is a good example for how you could define your own lookup tables and join with them.
The events in the DeviceEvents table contain a GUID for the various ASR rules rather than a full description of the rule.
This query will create a table which has the description for each ASR rule as per https://docs.microsoft.com/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-defender-exploit-guard/enable-attack-surface-reduction.
This table is then joined to the output of a query against the DeviceEvents table and shows a summary count of the events by the newly defined description.
This query shows the ability to use joins and custom dimension tables.
See https://docs.loganalytics.io/docs/Language-Reference/Tabular-operators/join-operator for more information on the join syntax.
For more questions on this query, feel free to ping @FlyingBlueMonki on twitter or mattegen@microsoft.com via email.
First lets start by creating a table of the rule descriptions to rule guids.
Get stats on ExploitGuard blocks - count events and machines per rule.
Get stats on ExploitGuard blocks - count events and machines per rule.
This analytic identifies high-severity intrusion events based on the classification assigned to Snort rules within Cisco Secure Firewall logs. It leverages Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense logs and focuses on events classified as: A Network Trojan was Detected, Successful Administrator Privilege Gain, Successful User Privilege Gain, Attempt to Login By a Default Username and Password, Known malware command and control traffic, Known malicious file or file based exploit, Known client side exploit attempt, Large Scale Information Leak. These classifications typically represent significant threats such as remote code execution, credential theft, lateral movement, or malware communication. Detection of these classifications should be prioritized for immediate investigation.
Detects Clfs.sys being loaded by a process running from a potentially suspicious location. Clfs.sys is loaded as part of many CVEs exploits that targets Common Log File System (CLFS) driver vulnerabilities. The rule identifies processes loading 'clfs.sys' from common temporary or user-writable directories often abused by malware or exploits.
