Detections

Explore public detection logic contributed by the community across SIEM and rule languages.

3,613 detections

The analytic identifies when a user with sufficient access to the O365 Security & Compliance portal uses premium investigation features (Threat Explorer) to directly view email. Adversaries may exploit privileged access with this premium feature to enumerate or exfiltrate sensitive data.
Splunk Security@SplunkSecurity
avatar
Splunk Security Content
1 year ago
0036
The analytic identifies the use of `sqlite3` querying the MacOS preferences to determine the original URL from which a package was downloaded. This detection leverages data from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents, focusing on process names and command-line executions involving `LSQuarantine`. This activity is significant as it is commonly associated with MacOS adware and other malicious software. If confirmed malicious, this behavior could indicate an attempt to track or manipulate downloaded packages, potentially leading to further system compromise or persistent adware infections.
Splunk Security@SplunkSecurity
avatar
Splunk Security Content
1 year ago
0036
The analytic detects the use of the Linux 'xclip' command to copy data from the clipboard. It leverages Linux Auditd telemetry, focusing on process names and command-line arguments related to clipboard operations. This activity is significant because adversaries can exploit clipboard data to capture sensitive information such as passwords or IP addresses. If confirmed malicious, this technique could lead to unauthorized data exfiltration, compromising sensitive information and potentially aiding further attacks within the environment.
Splunk Security@SplunkSecurity
avatar
Splunk Security Content
1 year ago
0034
The following analytic identifies network share discovery and collection activities performed on Windows systems using the Net command. Attackers often use network share discovery to identify accessible shared resources within a network, which can be a precursor to privilege escalation or data exfiltration. By monitoring Windows Event Logs for the usage of the Net command to list and interact with network shares, this detection helps identify potential reconnaissance and collection activities.
Splunk Security@SplunkSecurity
avatar
Splunk Security Content
1 year ago
0034
The following analytic detects when a content search is initiated within the Office 365 Security and Compliance Center. It leverages the SearchCreated operation from the o365_management_activity logs under the SecurityComplianceCenter workload. This activity is significant as it may indicate an attempt to access sensitive organizational data, including emails and documents. If confirmed malicious, this could lead to unauthorized data access, potential data exfiltration, and compliance violations. Monitoring this behavior helps ensure the integrity and security of organizational data.
Splunk Security@SplunkSecurity
avatar
Splunk Security Content
1 year ago
0033
This analytic detects the creation of .wav files in the AppData\Roaming folder, a behavior associated with Remcos RAT malware. Remcos RAT is known to store audio recordings in this location for data exfiltration. The detection leverages endpoint process and filesystem data to identify this activity. This activity is significant as it indicates potential unauthorized data collection and exfiltration by malware, which could lead to sensitive information being sent to an attacker's command and control server, compromising the affected system's confidentiality.
Splunk Security@SplunkSecurity
avatar
Splunk Security Content
1 year ago
1033
The analytic detects the use of the Linux 'xclip' command to copy data from the clipboard. It leverages Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) telemetry, focusing on process names and command-line arguments related to clipboard operations. This activity is significant because adversaries can exploit clipboard data to capture sensitive information such as passwords or IP addresses. If confirmed malicious, this technique could lead to unauthorized data exfiltration, compromising sensitive information and potentially aiding further attacks within the environment.
Splunk Security@SplunkSecurity
avatar
Splunk Security Content
1 year ago
1032
The following analytic detects when a process other than explorer.exe writes to the Windows Recycle Bin. It leverages the Endpoint.Filesystem and Endpoint.Processes data models in Splunk to identify any process writing to the "*$Recycle.Bin*" file path, excluding explorer.exe. This activity is significant because it may indicate an attacker attempting to hide their actions, potentially leading to data theft, ransomware, or other malicious outcomes. If confirmed malicious, this behavior could allow an attacker to persist in the environment and evade detection by security tools.
Splunk Security@SplunkSecurity
avatar
Splunk Security Content
1 year ago
1029
Detects suspicious child processes spawned by web servers, indicating potential webshell activity used for credential dumping, exfiltration, or other post-exploitation actions. The rule looks for specific command-line patterns and executables commonly associated with these malicious activities originating from known web server processes.
avatar
SigmaHQ Detections@sigmaHQ
avatar
SigmaHQ
2 years ago
1023
Detects the enabling of the Windows Recall feature by manipulating registry keys using `reg.exe`. This rule specifically looks for commands that either delete the `DisableAIDataAnalysis` registry value or set it to `0` within the `Microsoft\Windows\WindowsAI` path, indicating an attempt to activate the Recall feature. This activity is often associated with post-exploitation discovery and collection by adversaries.
avatar
SigmaHQ Detections@sigmaHQ
avatar
SigmaHQ
2 years ago
1020
Detects the enabling of the Windows Recall feature via registry manipulation. Windows Recall can be enabled by setting the value of "DisableAIDataAnalysis" to "0". Adversaries may enable Windows Recall as part of post-exploitation discovery and collection activities. This rule assumes that Recall is already explicitly disabled on the host, and subsequently enabled by the adversary.
avatar
SigmaHQ Detections@sigmaHQ
avatar
SigmaHQ
2 years ago
0020
Detects the enabling of the Windows Recall feature by deleting the "DisableAIDataAnalysis" registry value. Adversaries may enable Windows Recall as part of post-exploitation discovery and collection activities. This rule assumes that Recall is already explicitly disabled on the host and is subsequently enabled by an adversary.
avatar
SigmaHQ Detections@sigmaHQ
avatar
SigmaHQ
2 years ago
0012
Detects the enabling of the Windows Recall feature via registry manipulation.
Windows Recall can be enabled by deleting the existing "DisableAIDataAnalysis" value, or setting it to 0.
Adversaries may enable Windows Recall as part of post-exploitation discovery and collection activities.
This rule assumes that Recall is already explicitly disabled on the host, and subsequently enabled by the adversary.
avatar
SigmaHQ Detections@sigmaHQ
avatar
SigmaHQ
2 years ago
000
Detects the enabling of the Windows Recall feature via registry manipulation. Windows Recall can be enabled by deleting the existing "DisableAIDataAnalysis" registry value.
Adversaries may enable Windows Recall as part of post-exploitation discovery and collection activities.
This rule assumes that Recall is already explicitly disabled on the host, and subsequently enabled by the adversary.
avatar
SigmaHQ Detections@sigmaHQ
avatar
SigmaHQ
2 years ago
000
Detects the enabling of the Windows Recall feature via registry manipulation. Windows Recall can be enabled by setting the value of "DisableAIDataAnalysis" to "0".
Adversaries may enable Windows Recall as part of post-exploitation discovery and collection activities.
This rule assumes that Recall is already explicitly disabled on the host, and subsequently enabled by the adversary.
avatar
SigmaHQ Detections@sigmaHQ
avatar
SigmaHQ
2 years ago
000
Detects when a user grants access to a GitHub Personal Access Token (PAT) and subsequently clones a high number of non-public GitHub repositories. This behavior can indicate an adversary attempting to steal the contents of multiple GitHub repositories using an automated script or offensive tool after gaining access to a PAT.
avatar
Google SecOps@GoogleSecOps
avatar
Google SecOps Detection Rules
2 years ago
4099
Detects when a user clones a high number of non-public GitHub repositories. An adversary may attempt to steal the contents of several GitHub repositories after compromising a user account.
avatar
Google SecOps@GoogleSecOps
avatar
Google SecOps Detection Rules
2 years ago
1055
Detects when a user downloads a high number of non-public GitHub repositories. An adversary may attempt to steal the contents of several GitHub repositories after compromising a user account.
avatar
Google SecOps@GoogleSecOps
avatar
Google SecOps Detection Rules
2 years ago
1033
Detects when a user grants access to a GitHub Personal Access Token prior to cloning several GitHub non-public GitHub repositories. An adversary may grant access to a Personal Access Token before attempting to steal the contents of several GitHub repositories using a an automated script or offensive tool.
avatar
Google SecOps@GoogleSecOps
avatar
Google SecOps Detection Rules
2 years ago
102
This YARA rule detects the MiyaRAT backdoor by identifying specific byte patterns associated with its functionalities. The rule looks for distinct code sequences related to obtaining disk information, gathering operating system details, and taking screenshots. The presence of all these patterns within a single executable indicates the presence of MiyaRAT.
ReversingLabs Yara@ReversingLabsYara
avatar
ReversingLabs Yara
2 years ago
0032
Detects when a user clones a high number of non-public GitHub repositories. An adversary may attempt to steal the contents of several GitHub repositories after compromising a user account.
avatar
Google SecOps@GoogleSecOps
avatar
Google SecOps Detection Rules
2 years ago
101
Page 164 of 173