Detections
Explore public detection logic contributed by the community across SIEM and rule languages.
40,063 detections
Filters
Last updated
All Time
Detection languages
15,361
13,596
2,797
1,803
1,725
Contributors
7,678
5,999
5,315
4,504
4,191
Categories
18,113
9,760
3,854
3,760
3,714
Platforms
40,063
7,331
6,542
3,907
3,666
Products / Services
10,442
9,677
6,722
1,888
1,879
MITRE Techniques
13,738
13,119
8,068
5,949
4,415
CVEs
49
45
30
30
29
IDS Classtypes
214
56
43
23
19
IDS Protocols
183
172
20
16
8
Detects anomalous, rapid execution of a high volume of diverse offensive security tools (scanners, exploitation frameworks, and C2 agents) from a single parent process within a short window, which is characteristic of automated LLM-driven orchestration or scripted attack tool chaining.
Detects endpoint behavior consistent with AI-assisted exploit development, characterized by the execution of reverse engineering and vulnerability research tools (e.g., IDA Pro, Ghidra, AFL) interleaved with frequent outbound network connections to LLM APIs, followed by the local compilation of a new executable or DLL.
Detects coordinated activity patterns across multiple distinct tenant environments within a one-hour window. The rule looks for shared infrastructure (C2 domains), malicious tool hashes, or specific agentic-CLI command line signatures (e.g., related to orchestration, reconnaissance, or exfiltration) that suggest an AI-orchestrated actor or automated attack campaign affecting multiple organizations simultaneously.
Detects unauthorized modifications to AI agent configuration files, including system prompts, tool allow-lists, and MCP server registration files. Such changes are often performed by processes outside of approved configuration management or infrastructure-as-code pipelines, potentially allowing for persistent manipulation of AI model behavior and capabilities.
Detects anomalous, chained execution patterns initiated by AI agents integrated with Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. The rule identifies a multi-stage sequence involving the invocation of browser automation tools followed by shell execution and subsequent outbound network activity, potentially indicating an AI-driven attack chaining filesystem, shell, or cloud-API access in an unauthorized manner.
This rule correlates web clicks on Google Sites URLs containing keywords related to GlobalProtect with the subsequent creation or renaming of an unsigned or improperly signed GlobalProtect.msi file on the same endpoint within a 30-minute window. This behavior is indicative of a spearphishing attempt using a masqueraded landing page to deliver malicious or unauthorized software.
Detects anomalous, chained execution patterns initiated by AI agents integrated with Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. The rule identifies a multi-stage sequence involving the invocation of browser automation tools followed by shell execution and subsequent outbound network activity, potentially indicating an AI-driven attack chaining filesystem, shell, or cloud-API access in an unauthorized manner.
Detects anomalous, rapid execution of a high volume of diverse offensive security tools (scanners, exploitation frameworks, and C2 agents) from a single parent process within a short window, which is characteristic of automated LLM-driven orchestration or scripted attack tool chaining.
Detects outbound HTTPS connections to major generative AI inference endpoints originating from non-browser, non-development tool processes at regular intervals. This activity is indicative of beaconing behavior, where malware (specifically families like LAMEHUG) leverages LLM APIs for dynamic command generation, payload obfuscation, or C2 instruction retrieval, bypassing traditional security controls.
Detects anomalous remote access patterns on a single endpoint, specifically involving AnyDesk or TeamViewer sessions originating from multiple distinct geographical locations combined with usage by multiple distinct user accounts. This pattern is consistent with DPRK IT worker fraud (Wagemole) involving shared laptop farms.
Detects coordinated activity patterns across multiple distinct tenant environments within a one-hour window. The rule looks for shared infrastructure (C2 domains), malicious tool hashes, or specific agentic-CLI command line signatures (e.g., related to orchestration, reconnaissance, or exfiltration) that suggest an AI-orchestrated actor or automated attack campaign affecting multiple organizations simultaneously.
Detects anomalous, high-volume file access by a single process, followed by local file compression or archiving, and subsequent outbound data transfer to a non-internal IP address. This pattern is characteristic of automated agents (like those used in the GTG-1002/Anthropic AI-orchestrated campaigns) performing rapid data triage and staging for exfiltration.
Detects anomalous activity from IDEs or AI coding assistant extension host processes (e.g., VS Code, Cursor, JetBrains). The rule alerts when these processes spawn children that access sensitive local credential files, perform network connections to non-standard/unexpected domains, or modify critical CI/CD build script configuration files, which is indicative of a supply chain compromise within the developer environment.
Detects anomalous child process spawning from common web browsers or productivity applications (e.g., Office, Acrobat) on hosts that have recently communicated with known LLM or code-generation APIs. This behavioral correlation is intended to identify the potential execution of AI-generated exploit code.
Detects potential runtime polymorphic malware that modifies its own executable or script content while simultaneously communicating with generative AI or LLM API endpoints. This behavior indicates an adversary using LLMs to regenerate obfuscated code or mutate malware signatures dynamically at runtime.
Detects the execution of common remote monitoring and management (RMM) software on a host shortly after the associated user account underwent a password or MFA reset, a pattern indicative of help-desk impersonation (vishing) followed by unauthorized remote access setup.
Detects a sequence of suspicious activities on a Windows host aimed at inhibiting system recovery, such as deleting shadow copies, modifying boot recovery configurations, deleting backup catalogs, or stopping security and backup-related services. This rule aggregates distinct categories of these actions by DeviceId and Account to identify potential malicious intent characteristic of ransomware or data destructive attacks.
Hunts network, HTTP, and email-URL telemetry for known ARToken infrastructure (operator backend IPs and phishing/panel domains). Bounded to a 30-day lookback and tiers matches by confidence: domain hits are high-confidence (attacker-registered infrastructure), while IP hits are medium-confidence since the IPs sit on shared DigitalOcean hosting that can be reassigned to unrelated tenants once ARToken's infrastructure is taken down. Empty/unparsed indicator fields are excluded to avoid spurious matches in the HTTP event parsing branch. No known file hashes are associated with this intel.
Detects access to sensitive Active Directory objects associated with replication (specifically the Domain, Domain Controller, and Schema objects) by non-computer accounts, which may indicate an attempt to perform unauthorized replication or credential harvesting (e.g., DCSync attacks).
Detects instances where AI-assisted development tools (such as Claude, Codex, Copilot, or Gemini) initiate command-line processes (e.g., shells, interpreters, or network utilities) with arguments indicative of credential access, reconnaissance, or sensitive file interactions.
Detects an exploitation chain originating from a Chrome browser process, characterized by the execution of an anomalous child process followed by the creation of an executable file named 'chrome_cleanup.exe' within a short time window. This sequence is indicative of multi-stage exploitation, involving remote code execution via browser vulnerability and subsequent privilege escalation.
Page 230 of 1908