Detections
Explore public detection logic contributed by the community across SIEM and rule languages.
6,695 detections
Filters
Last updated
All Time
Detection languages
2,745
1,501
1,114
673
407
Contributors
1,570
1,362
1,278
896
185
Categories
3,709
2,352
767
581
457
Platforms
6,668
71
52
31
29
Products / Services
10,684
9,759
6,695
4,421
3,751
MITRE Techniques
2,448
1,976
1,634
1,401
856
CVEs
11
10
9
9
7
IDS Classtypes
1
IDS Protocols
1
The analytic detects the execution of odbcconf.exe with the regsvr action to load a DLL. This is identified by monitoring command-line arguments in process creation logs. This activity is significant as it may indicate an attempt to execute arbitrary code via DLL loading, a common technique used in various attack vectors. If confirmed malicious, this could allow an attacker to execute code with the privileges of the odbcconf.exe process, potentially leading to system compromise or further lateral movement.
This analytic detects Microsoft Office applications dropping or creating executables or scripts on a Windows OS. It leverages process creation and file system events from the Endpoint data model to identify Office applications like Word or Excel generating files with extensions such as ".exe", ".dll", or ".ps1". This behavior is significant as it is often associated with spear-phishing attacks where malicious files are dropped to compromise the host. If confirmed malicious, this activity could lead to code execution, privilege escalation, or persistent access, posing a severe threat to the environment.
This analytic detects processes with command lines containing named pipes. This behavior is often used by adversaries for inter-process communication post-injection, aiding in defense evasion and privilege escalation. The rule specifically excludes processes originating from common program file paths to reduce false positives. If confirmed malicious, this activity could allow attackers to maintain persistence, escalate privileges, or evade defenses, potentially leading to further compromise of the system.
The following analytic detects the stopping of the Windows Security Account Manager (SAM) service via command-line, typically using the "net stop samss" command. This detection leverages data from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents, focusing on process names and command-line executions. This activity is significant because stopping the SAM service can disrupt authentication mechanisms and is often associated with ransomware attacks like Ryuk. If confirmed malicious, this action could lead to unauthorized access, privilege escalation, and potential system-wide compromise.
The following analytic detects an anomaly where an svchost.exe process is spawned by a parent process other than the standard services.exe. In a typical Windows environment, svchost.exe is a system process that hosts Windows service DLLs, and is expected to be a child of services.exe. A process deviation from this hierarchy may indicate suspicious behavior, such as malicious code attempting to masquerade as a legitimate system process or evade detection. It is essential to investigate the parent process and associated behavior for further signs of compromise or unauthorized activity.
This analytic detects the use of WMIC to delete volume shadow copies, which is a common technique used by ransomware actors to prevent system recovery. Ransomware like Cactus often delete shadow copies before encrypting files to ensure victims cannot recover their data without paying the ransom. This behavior is particularly concerning as it indicates potential ransomware activity or malicious actors attempting to prevent system recovery.
The following analytic identifies the execution of tools built by NirSoft by detecting specific command-line arguments such as "/stext" and "/scomma". It leverages data from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents, focusing on process names, parent processes, and command-line executions. This activity is significant because NirSoft tools, while legitimate, can be exploited by attackers for malicious purposes such as credential theft or system reconnaissance. If confirmed malicious, this activity could lead to unauthorized access, data exfiltration, or further compromise of the affected system.
The following analytic identifies an excessive number of taskhost.exe and taskhostex.exe processes running within a short time frame. It leverages data from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents, focusing on process names and their counts. This behavior is significant as it is commonly associated with post-exploitation tools like Meterpreter and Koadic, which use multiple instances of these processes for actions such as discovery and lateral movement. If confirmed malicious, this activity could indicate an ongoing attack, allowing attackers to execute code, escalate privileges, or move laterally within the network.
The analytic detects the execution of `powershell.exe` or `cmd.exe` with command-line arguments that include `Get-ADUser` and `*-filter*`. This activity indicates an attempt to enumerate domain users, which is a common reconnaissance technique used by adversaries to gather information about Active Directory users for situational awareness and to identify high-value targets for subsequent attacks.
The analytic detects the execution of the Get-ForestTrust command via PowerShell or cmd.exe. This command is commonly used by adversaries to gather domain trust information, which is a reconnaissance effort to map out domain trusts. Identifying this activity is crucial as it indicates potential reconnaissance efforts to map out domain trusts, which can inform further attacks. If confirmed malicious, this activity could allow attackers to understand domain relationships, aiding in lateral movement and privilege escalation within the network.
The analytic detects the execution of `powershell.exe` with command-line arguments used to query domain users via the `Get-WmiObject` cmdlet and `-class ds_user` parameter. This activity indicates potential reconnaissance efforts by adversaries to enumerate domain users, which is a common step in Active Directory Discovery. If confirmed malicious, this could lead to further attacks, including privilege escalation and lateral movement within the network.
The following analytic detects attempts to access the SAM, SYSTEM, or SECURITY database files within the `windows\system32\config` directory using Windows Security EventCode 4663. This detection leverages Windows Security Event logs to identify unauthorized access attempts. Monitoring this activity is crucial as it indicates potential credential access attempts, possibly exploiting vulnerabilities like CVE-2021-36934. If confirmed malicious, an attacker could extract user passwords, leading to unauthorized access, privilege escalation, and further compromise of the system.
The following analytic detects the use of 'schtasks.exe' to schedule forced system reboots using the 'shutdown' and '/create' flags. It leverages endpoint process data to identify instances where these specific command-line arguments are used. This activity is significant because it may indicate an adversary attempting to disrupt operations or force a reboot to execute further malicious actions. If confirmed malicious, this could lead to system downtime, potential data loss, and provide an attacker with an opportunity to execute additional payloads or evade detection.
The analytic detects instances of DLLHost.exe executing without command line arguments. This behavior is unusual and often associated with malicious activities, such as those performed by Cobalt Strike. The detection leverages data from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents, focusing on process execution logs. This activity is significant because DLLHost.exe typically requires arguments to function correctly, and its absence may indicate an attempt to evade detection. If confirmed malicious, this could lead to unauthorized actions like credential dumping or file manipulation, posing a severe threat to the environment.
The following analytic detects the disabling of audit policies on a domain controller. It leverages EventCode 4719 from Windows Security Event Logs to identify changes where success or failure auditing is removed. This activity is significant as it suggests an attacker may have gained access to the domain controller and is attempting to evade detection by tampering with audit policies. If confirmed malicious, this could lead to severe consequences, including data theft, privilege escalation, and full network compromise. Immediate investigation is required to determine the source and intent of the change.
This detection identifies when an Active Directory Group Policy Object (GPO) is disabled. Adversaries may disable GPOs to impair defenses, remove security policies, or facilitate other malicious activities within the domain. The rule specifically looks for EventCode 5136 with AttributeLDAPDisplayName 'flags' and an AttributeValue indicating the GPO is disabled (values 1, 2, or 3). It then joins this with Active Directory monitoring data to get the display name of the GPO.
This analytic identifies when the Security Identifier (SID) of a privileged user is added to the SID History attribute of another user account in Active Directory. It specifically looks for Windows Security Event Codes 4742 (A computer account was changed) and 4738 (A user account was changed), combined with identity lookups to determine if the added SID belongs to a privileged account. This activity is critical as it can indicate an attempt to abuse SID history for unauthorized access, privilege escalation, or persistent access within an environment, posing a significant security risk.
The following analytic identifies the creation and quick deletion of a Domain Controller (DC) object within 30 seconds in an Active Directory environment, indicative of a potential DCShadow attack. This detection leverages Windows Security Event Codes 5137 and 5141, analyzing the duration between these events. This activity is significant as DCShadow allows attackers with privileged access to register a rogue DC, enabling unauthorized changes to AD objects, including credentials. If confirmed malicious, this could lead to unauthorized AD modifications, compromising the integrity and security of the entire domain.
The following analytic identifies the execution of `auditpol.exe` with the "/clear" command-line argument used to clears the audit policy. It leverages data from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents, focusing on process names and command-line executions. This activity can be significant as it indicates potential defense evasion by adversaries or Red Teams, aiming to limit data that can be leveraged for detections and audits. If confirmed malicious, this behavior could allow attackers to bypass defenses, and plan further attacks, potentially leading to full machine compromise or lateral movement.
The following analytic identifies the execution of `auditpol.exe` with the "/set" command-line argument in order to disable a specific category or sub-category from the audit policy. It leverages data from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents, focusing on process names and command-line executions. This activity can be significant as it indicates potential defense evasion by adversaries or Red Teams, aiming to limit data that can be leveraged for detections and audits. If confirmed malicious, this behavior could allow attackers to bypass defenses, and plan further attacks, potentially leading to full machine compromise or lateral movement.
The following analytic detects the use of the sfc.exe utility with the "-u" parameter, which is part of the Cisco Secure Endpoint installation. The "-u" flag allows the uninstallation of Cisco Secure Endpoint components. This detection leverages endpoint telemetry to monitor command-line executions that include the "-u" parameter. The use of this flag is significant as it could indicate an attempt to disable or remove endpoint protection, potentially leaving the system vulnerable to further exploitation. If identified as malicious, this action may be part of a broader effort to disable security mechanisms and avoid detection.
Page 283 of 319