Detections
Explore public detection logic contributed by the community across SIEM and rule languages.
960 detections
Filters
Last updated
All Time
Detection languages
215
211
197
168
63
Contributors
283
142
113
112
85
Categories
670
218
168
112
95
Platforms
39,908
7,245
6,529
3,864
3,627
960
Products / Services
713
68
64
59
59
MITRE Techniques
310
305
146
136
134
CVEs
5
3
3
2
1
IDS Classtypes
13
11
11
9
8
IDS Protocols
62
1
This analytic detects AWS console login events by users who have not previously logged into the AWS console. It uses AWS CloudTrail events and compares them against a baseline of known users. A new user logging into the AWS console could indicate the creation of new accounts or potential unauthorized access, which could lead to unauthorized access to AWS resources, data exfiltration, or further exploitation within the cloud environment.
The following analytic detects a spike in the number of API calls made to cloud security groups by a user. It leverages data from the Change data model, focusing on successful firewall-related changes. This activity is significant because an abnormal increase in security group API calls can indicate potential malicious activity, such as unauthorized access or configuration changes. If confirmed malicious, this could allow an attacker to manipulate security group settings, potentially exposing sensitive resources or disrupting network security controls.
The following analytic identifies the registration of a new Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) method for an AWS account, as logged through Amazon Security Lake (ASL). It detects this activity by monitoring the `CreateVirtualMFADevice` API operation within ASL logs. This behavior is significant because adversaries who gain unauthorized access to an AWS account may register a new MFA method to maintain persistence. If confirmed malicious, this activity could allow attackers to secure their access, making it harder to detect and remove their presence from the compromised environment.
The following analytic identifies the creation of cloud compute instances by users who have not previously created them. It leverages data from the Change data model, focusing on 'create' actions by users, and cross-references with a baseline of known user activities. This activity is significant as it may indicate unauthorized access or misuse of cloud resources by new or compromised accounts. If confirmed malicious, attackers could deploy unauthorized compute instances, leading to potential data exfiltration, increased costs, or further exploitation within the cloud environment.
The analytic identifies cloud instances being modified by users who have not previously modified them. This activity is significant because it can indicate unauthorized or suspicious changes by potentially compromised or malicious users. If confirmed malicious, this could lead to unauthorized access, configuration changes, or potential disruption of cloud services, posing a significant risk to the organization's cloud infrastructure.
The following analytic detects the creation of EC2 instances with previously unseen instance types. It leverages Splunk's tstats command to analyze data from the Change data model, identifying instance types that have not been previously recorded. This activity is significant for a SOC because it may indicate unauthorized or suspicious activity, such as an attacker attempting to create instances for malicious purposes. If confirmed malicious, this could lead to unauthorized access, data exfiltration, system compromise, or service disruption. Immediate investigation is required to determine the legitimacy of the instance creation.
The analytic detects the creation of a cloud compute instance in a region that has not been previously used within the last hour. It leverages cloud infrastructure logs and compares the regions of newly created instances against a lookup file of historically used regions. This activity is significant because the creation of instances in new regions can indicate unauthorized or suspicious activity, such as an attacker attempting to evade detection or establish a foothold in a less monitored area. If confirmed malicious, this could lead to unauthorized resource usage, data exfiltration, or further compromise of the cloud environment.
This rule detects user logins from multiple distinct states or countries within a one-hour window, leveraging GeoIP enrichment. It specifically looks for successful login events where a user logs in from at least two different states or at least one country, indicating potential 'impossible travel' or suspicious access patterns.
Detect multiple user logins from multiple states or countries using Chronicle GeoIP enrichment.
The analytic identifies access denied errors when attempting to invoke AWS Bedrock models. It leverages AWS CloudTrail logs to detect when a user or service receives an AccessDenied error when calling the InvokeModel API. This activity is significant as it may indicate an adversary attempting to access Bedrock models with insufficient permissions after compromising credentials. If confirmed malicious, this could suggest reconnaissance activities or privilege escalation attempts targeting generative AI resources, potentially leading to data exfiltration or manipulation of model outputs.
The following analytic identifies attempts to delete AWS Bedrock Knowledge Bases, which are resources that store and manage domain-specific information for AI models. It monitors AWS CloudTrail logs for DeleteKnowledgeBase API calls. This activity could indicate an adversary attempting to remove knowledge bases after compromising credentials, potentially to disrupt business operations or remove traces of data access. Deleting knowledge bases could impact model performance, remove critical business context, or be part of a larger attack to degrade AI capabilities. If confirmed malicious, this could represent a deliberate attempt to cause service disruption or data loss.
The following analytic identifies the creation of AWS IAM access keys by a user for another user, which can indicate privilege escalation. It leverages AWS CloudTrail logs to detect instances where the user creating the access key is different from the user for whom the key is created. This activity is significant because unauthorized access key creation can allow attackers to establish persistence or exfiltrate data via AWS APIs. If confirmed malicious, this could lead to unauthorized access to AWS services, data exfiltration, and long-term persistence in the environment.
The following analytic identifies attempts to delete AWS Bedrock model invocation logging configurations. It leverages AWS CloudTrail logs to detect when a user or service calls the DeleteModelInvocationLogging API. This activity is significant as it may indicate an adversary attempting to remove audit trails of model interactions after compromising credentials. Deleting model invocation logs could allow attackers to interact with AI models without leaving traces, potentially enabling them to conduct data exfiltration, prompt injection attacks, or other malicious activities without detection. If confirmed malicious, this could represent a deliberate attempt to hide unauthorized model usage and evade detection.
This analytic detects API calls to enable S3 bucket replication services. It leverages AWS CloudTrail logs to identify `PutBucketReplication` events, focusing on fields like `bucketName`, `ReplicationConfiguration.Rule.Destination.Bucket`, and user details. This activity is significant as it can indicate unauthorized data replication, potentially leading to data exfiltration. If confirmed malicious, attackers could replicate sensitive data to external accounts, leading to data breaches and compliance violations.
The following analytic identifies a high number of AccessDenied attempts to list AWS Bedrock foundation models. It leverages AWS CloudTrail logs to detect when a user or service experiences multiple failures when calling the ListFoundationModels API. This activity is significant as it may indicate an adversary performing reconnaissance of available AI models after compromising credentials with limited permissions. Repeated failures could suggest brute force attempts to enumerate accessible resources or misconfigured access controls. If confirmed malicious, this could represent early-stage reconnaissance before attempting to access or manipulate Bedrock models or knowledge bases.
The following analytic identifies excessive AccessDenied events within an hour timeframe for IAM users in AWS. It leverages AWS CloudTrail logs to detect multiple failed access attempts from the same source IP and user identity. This activity is significant as it may indicate that an access key has been compromised and is being misused for unauthorized discovery actions. If confirmed malicious, this could allow attackers to gather information about the AWS environment, potentially leading to further exploitation or privilege escalation.
The following analytic identifies attempts to delete AWS Bedrock GuardRails, which are security controls designed to prevent harmful, biased, or inappropriate AI outputs. It leverages AWS CloudTrail logs to detect when a user or service calls the DeleteGuardrail API. This activity is significant as it may indicate an adversary attempting to remove safety guardrails after compromising credentials, potentially to enable harmful or malicious model outputs. Removing guardrails could allow attackers to extract sensitive information, generate offensive content, or bypass security controls designed to prevent prompt injection and other AI-specific attacks. If confirmed malicious, this could represent a deliberate attempt to manipulate model behavior for harmful purposes.
The following analytic detects a series of AWS API calls related to EC2 snapshots within a short time window, indicating potential exfiltration via EC2 Snapshot modifications. It leverages AWS CloudTrail logs to identify actions such as creating, describing, and modifying snapshot attributes. This activity is significant as it may indicate an attacker attempting to exfiltrate data by sharing EC2 snapshots externally. If confirmed malicious, the attacker could gain access to sensitive information stored in the snapshots, leading to data breaches and potential compliance violations.
This analytic identifies an abnormally high number of cloud instances being destroyed within a 4-hour period. It leverages cloud infrastructure logs and applies a probability density model to detect outliers. This activity is significant for a SOC because a sudden spike in destroyed instances could indicate malicious activity, such as an insider threat or a compromised account attempting to disrupt services. If confirmed malicious, this could lead to significant operational disruptions, data loss, and potential financial impact due to the destruction of critical cloud resources.
The analytic identifies spikes in blocked outbound network connections originating from within an AWS environment. It uses VPC Flow Logs data from CloudWatch, specifically looking for 'blocked' actions from internal IP ranges (10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16) to external destinations. A spike is determined by comparing the current number of blocked connections against a calculated baseline (average and standard deviation) over time. This detection is significant as it can indicate potential exfiltration attempts or misconfigurations leading to data leakage. If confirmed malicious, such activity could allow attackers to bypass network defenses, leading to unauthorized data transfer or communication with malicious external entities.
The following analytic detects when an EC2 snapshot is shared with an external AWS account by analyzing AWS CloudTrail events. This detection method leverages CloudTrail logs to identify modifications in snapshot permissions, specifically when the snapshot is shared outside the originating AWS account. This activity is significant as it may indicate an attempt to exfiltrate sensitive data stored in the snapshot. If confirmed malicious, an attacker could gain unauthorized access to the snapshot's data, potentially leading to data breaches or further exploitation of the compromised information.
Page 34 of 46