Radiology Departments at High Risk for Ransomware
Score: 8/10

Radiology Departments at High Risk for Ransomware

Ransomware groups including CHAOS, Medusa, and Gunra are increasingly targeting radiology departments and healthcare providers using double-extortion and extortion-only tactics.

Executive Summary

Radiology departments are facing an elevated risk of ransomware attacks, exemplified by the CHAOS group's July 2026 claim of exfiltrating 655GB of data from Radia Inc. The healthcare sector remains the most targeted critical infrastructure sector, with actors like Medusa, Gunra, and Qilin actively exploiting vulnerabilities in network appliances and legacy medical infrastructure. There is a notable strategic shift toward extortion-only models, where attackers skip encryption in favor of leaking sensitive medical imaging and patient records to pressure victims into payment.

Technical analysis shows that actors are heavily exploiting authentication bypass vulnerabilities in Fortinet devices (CVE-2024-55591 and CVE-2025-24472) for initial access. Radiology departments are particularly vulnerable due to high data density, a sprawl of connected digital imaging devices (PACS/RIS), and unpatched legacy operating systems in MRI and CT scanners. The impact of these attacks extends beyond data loss to significant clinical disruption, forcing emergency care delays and manual reporting workflows.

The business impact is severe, encompassing multi-million dollar legal settlements, HIPAA notification obligations, and supply-chain interruptions. As ransom payments decline and recovery speeds improve for encryption-based events, defenders must pivot toward detecting the stealthier behaviors associated with pure data extortion and lateral movement through living-off-the-land techniques.

Key Details

Threat Name

CHAOS Ransomware

Affects

Fortinet FortiOS, Fortinet FortiProxy

Adversary

CHAOS Other Adversaries and Aliases: Medusa; Gunra; Qilin

Malware/Tools

CHAOS, Medusa, Gunra, Qilin, Black Basta, REvil, BlackCat, Conti

Report Score

8out of 10
Quality Score
Good
IOC Quality7
TTP Details9
Detection Guidance8
Enterprise Relevance9
Clarity & Structure9
Technical Depth7

Sources