Detections

Explore public detection logic contributed by the community across SIEM and rule languages.

452 detections

Detects requests to a LiteLLM proxy that have been assigned the 'PROXY_ADMIN' role despite the absence of valid authentication credentials (Authorization headers, JWT tokens, or OAuth2 tokens). This pattern typically indicates that the LiteLLM instance is misconfigured, specifically that a 'master_key' is missing, causing the proxy to default to a permissive mode where every request is treated as having administrative privileges.
avatar
Arnold Chan@slaz
avatar
Detections.ai Community
2 months ago
102
This rule detects attempts to exploit the LiteLLM proxy pass-through endpoint to interact with the cloud Instance Metadata Service (IMDS). Specifically, it identifies configuration attempts to route traffic to the IMDS IP (169.254.169.254) and subsequent requests to retrieve IAM security credentials, which is indicative of a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack to steal cloud identity tokens.
avatar
Arnold Chan@slaz
avatar
Midnight Slayer
2 months ago
001
Detects requests to a LiteLLM proxy that have been assigned the 'PROXY_ADMIN' role despite the absence of valid authentication credentials (Authorization headers, JWT tokens, or OAuth2 tokens). This pattern typically indicates that the LiteLLM instance is misconfigured, specifically that a 'master_key' is missing, causing the proxy to default to a permissive mode where every request is treated as having administrative privileges.
avatar
Arnold Chan@slaz
avatar
Midnight Slayer
2 months ago
001
Detects requests to a LiteLLM proxy that have been assigned the 'PROXY_ADMIN' role despite the absence of valid authentication credentials (Authorization headers, JWT tokens, or OAuth2 tokens). This pattern typically indicates that the LiteLLM instance is misconfigured, specifically that a 'master_key' is missing, causing the proxy to default to a permissive mode where every request is treated as having administrative privileges.
avatar
Arnold Chan@slaz
Defender - KQL
2 months ago
001
Detects requests to a LiteLLM proxy that have been assigned the 'PROXY_ADMIN' role despite the absence of valid authentication credentials (Authorization headers, JWT tokens, or OAuth2 tokens). This pattern typically indicates that the LiteLLM instance is misconfigured, specifically that a 'master_key' is missing, causing the proxy to default to a permissive mode where every request is treated as having administrative privileges.
avatar
Arnold Chan@slaz
avatar
Detection & Hunting Community
2 months ago
001
Detects instances where a LiteLLM proxy is utilized to invoke sensitive Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools (e.g., database, github, slack, jira, ci/cd) while authentication is bypassed ('allow_all_keys=true') and no explicit API key is provided. This indicates a potential unauthorized access attempt to sensitive integrations via a misconfigured proxy.
avatar
Arnold Chan@slaz
Defender - KQL
2 months ago
001
Detects instances where a LiteLLM proxy is utilized to invoke sensitive Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools (e.g., database, github, slack, jira, ci/cd) while authentication is bypassed ('allow_all_keys=true') and no explicit API key is provided. This indicates a potential unauthorized access attempt to sensitive integrations via a misconfigured proxy.
avatar
Arnold Chan@slaz
avatar
Midnight Slayer
2 months ago
001
Detects instances where a LiteLLM proxy is utilized to invoke sensitive Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools (e.g., database, github, slack, jira, ci/cd) while authentication is bypassed ('allow_all_keys=true') and no explicit API key is provided. This indicates a potential unauthorized access attempt to sensitive integrations via a misconfigured proxy.
avatar
Arnold Chan@slaz
avatar
Detection & Hunting Community
2 months ago
001
Detects instances where a LiteLLM proxy is utilized to invoke sensitive Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools (e.g., database, github, slack, jira, ci/cd) while authentication is bypassed ('allow_all_keys=true') and no explicit API key is provided. This indicates a potential unauthorized access attempt to sensitive integrations via a misconfigured proxy.
avatar
Arnold Chan@slaz
avatar
Detections.ai Community
2 months ago
001
This rule detects attempts to exploit the LiteLLM proxy pass-through endpoint to interact with the cloud Instance Metadata Service (IMDS). Specifically, it identifies configuration attempts to route traffic to the IMDS IP (169.254.169.254) and subsequent requests to retrieve IAM security credentials, which is indicative of a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack to steal cloud identity tokens.
avatar
Arnold Chan@slaz
avatar
Detection & Hunting Community
2 months ago
000
Detects outbound HTTP GET/POST requests containing 'event=pasted' in the query string or URL, often directed at paths like '/api/metrics/run'. This pattern is associated with 'ClickFix' or 'AMOS' second-stage beaconing, where an adversary confirms a victim has successfully executed a social-engineered command (e.g., via copy-paste into a terminal) before proceeding with further payload delivery.
avatar
Emiliano Mema@Nosalva
avatar
Detections.ai Community
2 months ago
1107
Detects command-and-control network traffic associated with the DEV#POPPER (Void Dokkaebi/Contagious Interview) RAT. The rule monitors for characteristic WebSocket heartbeat and notification calls to '/verify-human/' endpoints, data exfiltration requests to '/u/f', and outbound connections to known malicious C2 IP addresses.
avatar
Emiliano Mema@Nosalva
avatar
Detections.ai Community
2 months ago
007
Detects SSRF attempts targeting cloud metadata endpoints or internal/private network addresses.
avatar
Anmol Vats@jerry
avatar
Detection Engineers
2 months ago
002
Detects C2Looper v1 malware communication patterns, specifically plaintext HTTP beaconing to /api/beacon or /api/result endpoints with characteristic JSON body fields (id, user, host, pid, cmd, arg, seq), as well as direct network connections to known C2Looper command-and-control infrastructure on TCP port 8888.
avatar
Emiliano Mema@Nosalva
avatar
Detections.ai Community
2 months ago
003
This rule aggregates Zscaler Internet Access (ZIA) logs to identify users with Data Loss Prevention (DLP) violations. It calculates the frequency of incidents and flags high-activity users for potential data exfiltration analysis.
avatar
KQL Cowboy@KQLCowboy
avatar
Zscaler Detection Engineering
2 months ago
007
This rule aggregates Zscaler Internet Access (ZIA) logs to identify users with Data Loss Prevention (DLP) violations. It calculates the frequency of incidents and flags high-activity users for potential data exfiltration analysis.
avatar
KQL Cowboy@KQLCowboy
avatar
Zscaler Detection Engineering
2 months ago
003
Detects instances where sensitive or organizational data is uploaded to public text storage repositories like Pastebin or GitHub Gists through Netskope, which may indicate data exfiltration.
avatar
KQL Cowboy@KQLCowboy
avatar
Netskope Detection Engineering
2 months ago
203
KQL Query
avatar
KQL Cowboy@KQLCowboy
avatar
Zscaler Detection Engineering
2 months ago
002
Detects instances where sensitive or organizational data is uploaded to public text storage repositories like Pastebin or GitHub Gists through Netskope, which may indicate data exfiltration.
avatar
KQL Cowboy@KQLCowboy
avatar
Detections.ai Community
2 months ago
102
Detects potentially unauthorized or suspicious file activities such as bulk downloads, external file sharing, or CASB policy violations monitored by Zscaler ZIA, which may indicate data exfiltration or policy non-compliance.
avatar
KQL Cowboy@KQLCowboy
avatar
Zscaler Detection Engineering
2 months ago
001
Detects potentially unauthorized or suspicious file activities such as bulk downloads, external file sharing, or CASB policy violations monitored by Zscaler ZIA, which may indicate data exfiltration or policy non-compliance.
avatar
KQL Cowboy@KQLCowboy
avatar
Zscaler Detection Engineering
2 months ago
000
Page 7 of 22