Detections

Explore public detection logic contributed by the community across SIEM and rule languages.

40 detections

Detects the creation of scheduled tasks on remote hosts by monitoring for the NetrJobAdd function call (opnum 0) against the ATSVC RPC interface (UUID: 1FF70682-0A51-30E8-076D-740BE8CEE98B). This interface is associated with the legacy Windows AT scheduler, which is frequently abused by offensive security tools like Impacket's atexec for remote command execution and lateral movement.
avatar
Lacey Cochrane@NullVectorX
avatar
XQL Threat Forge
24 days ago
1012
The following analytic detects the execution of the "At" application in Linux, which can be used by attackers to create persistence entries on a compromised host. This detection leverages data from Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents, focusing on process names and parent process names associated with "at" or "atd". This activity is significant because the "At" application can be exploited to maintain unauthorized access or deliver additional malicious payloads. If confirmed malicious, this behavior could lead to data theft, ransomware attacks, or other severe consequences. Immediate investigation is required to determine the legitimacy of the execution and mitigate potential risks.
Splunk Security@SplunkSecurity
avatar
Splunk Security Content
16 days ago
000
Detects the creation of scheduled tasks (Windows), cron jobs (Linux), or systemd timers where the initiating process is a common scripting or runtime interpreter (e.g., Python, Node.js, PowerShell, Java). This activity is often indicative of persistence mechanisms being established by a compromised agent or script-based process.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
28 days ago
104
Detects the creation of scheduled tasks (Windows), cron jobs (Linux), or systemd timers where the initiating process is a common scripting or runtime interpreter (e.g., Python, Node.js, PowerShell, Java). This activity is often indicative of persistence mechanisms being established by a compromised agent or script-based process.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
28 days ago
103
Detects creation of scheduled tasks for execution or persistence
avatar
Darshan Thummar@Mighty
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
007
Detects the creation of scheduled tasks (via schtasks.exe or at.exe) that include command-line arguments referencing virtualization artifacts (qemu, .qcow2, .vmdk, TPMProfiler) or specific database/dll files (vault.db, bisrv.dll). This pattern is often indicative of persistence mechanisms used by malware or threat actors to manage virtualized environments, exfiltrate data, or deploy components.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
002
Detects use of scheduled tasks to break process trees and hide parent relationships
avatar
Darshan Thummar@Mighty
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
005
Detects the creation of scheduled tasks using schtasks.exe or at.exe by processes not signed by Microsoft. This behavior is often associated with adversary attempts to establish persistence by running code on a recurring basis or at specific times using native Windows utilities.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
Bharat Cyber Guardians
4 months ago
002
Detects the creation of scheduled tasks using schtasks.exe or at.exe by processes not signed by Microsoft. This behavior is often associated with adversary attempts to establish persistence by running code on a recurring basis or at specific times using native Windows utilities.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
002
This rule detects the creation or modification of scheduled tasks using utilities like schtasks.exe or at.exe that are followed by the execution of script-based interpreters (PowerShell, CMD, or WScript). This pattern is commonly indicative of an attacker establishing persistence by scheduling malicious scripts to run automatically.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
005
Detects AT job creation via SMB for remote scheduled execution
avatar
Darshan Thummar@Mighty
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
003
Detects the creation of scheduled tasks or command-line execution of task scheduling utilities (schtasks.exe, at.exe) that reference known SharkLoader persistence paths, file names, or task naming conventions.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
001
This rule detects the creation of scheduled tasks or 'at' jobs initiated by VBScript engines (wscript.exe or cscript.exe). This behavior can be indicative of malicious activity, such as persistence mechanisms established by malware or phishing attacks that leverage VBScript to schedule future execution.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
Bharat Cyber Guardians
4 months ago
105
This rule detects the creation or modification of scheduled tasks using utilities like schtasks.exe or at.exe that are followed by the execution of script-based interpreters (PowerShell, CMD, or WScript). This pattern is commonly indicative of an attacker establishing persistence by scheduling malicious scripts to run automatically.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
Bharat Cyber Guardians
4 months ago
001
This rule detects the creation of scheduled tasks or 'at' jobs initiated by VBScript engines (wscript.exe or cscript.exe). This behavior can be indicative of malicious activity, such as persistence mechanisms established by malware or phishing attacks that leverage VBScript to schedule future execution.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
avatar
Detections.ai Community
4 months ago
001
This rule detects attempts to schedule a remote AT job via SMB. It specifically looks for TCP traffic on port 445 (SMB) directed to the home network, containing the case-insensitive strings "atsvc" and "JobAdd". This combination indicates an attempt to use the AT service to add a scheduled task remotely, which can be a method for persistence or execution by attackers.
avatar
Darshan Thummar@Mighty
avatar
Detections.ai Community
5 months ago
004
This rule detects attempts to execute AT commands via a web shell. It specifically looks for HTTP requests containing both 'at+' and 'cmd' in the URI, case-insensitively. This pattern is indicative of an attacker trying to run system commands through a compromised web application.
avatar
Darshan Thummar@Mighty
avatar
Detections.ai Community
5 months ago
002
Detects the creation of remote scheduled tasks by monitoring access to the 'atsvc' named pipe over SMB. This activity is indicative of using tools like 'at.exe' or direct API calls to schedule tasks on a remote system, which can be leveraged for privilege escalation, execution, lateral movement, or persistence.
avatar
SigmaHQ Detections@sigmaHQ
avatar
SigmaHQ
1 year ago
0042
This rule detects the remote creation of scheduled tasks by monitoring access to the 'ATSVC' named pipe within the IPC$ share. Specifically, it looks for Event ID 5145, indicating a detailed file share access, where the ShareName is '\\*\IPC$', the RelativeTargetName is 'atsvc', and the AccessList contains 'WriteData'. This activity is characteristic of tools like 'at.exe' or direct API calls used to schedule tasks remotely.
avatar
SigmaHQ Detections@sigmaHQ
avatar
SigmaHQ
1 year ago
0035
Detects remote RPC calls to create or execute a scheduled task via the Advanced Telephony Service (ATSvc) interface. This activity can be indicative of lateral movement, privilege escalation, or persistence mechanisms used by adversaries.
avatar
SigmaHQ Detections@sigmaHQ
avatar
SigmaHQ
1 year ago
0033
This rule detects suspicious DCE-RPC function calls that indicate remote execution techniques on a Windows system. It specifically looks for operations related to scheduled tasks (JobAdd, SchRpcEnableTask, SchRpcRegisterTask, SchRpcRun), WMI execution (ExecMethod, ExecMethodAsync), and service creation/start (CreateServiceA/W, StartServiceA/W). These activities are commonly abused by adversaries for initial access, persistence, and lateral movement.
avatar
SigmaHQ Detections@sigmaHQ
avatar
SigmaHQ
1 year ago
0032
Page 1 of 2