Detections

Explore public detection logic contributed by the community across SIEM and rule languages.

82 detections

Detects Git clone or fetch operations targeting bitbucket.org where the requested branch or ref is formatted as a SHA hash. This specific pattern is identified as a potential precondition for exploitation attempts targeting vulnerabilities like Plugin4Shell, where malicious branch names are used to trigger code execution on the server-side.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
avatar
Detections.ai Community
28 days ago
002
Detects login attempts to source code repositories and developer tooling (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Slack, Visual Studio Code) originating from unmanaged or non-compliant devices, excluding traffic originating from known corporate network ranges.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
1 month ago
002
Detects the creation of a Git branch where the branch name matches the pattern of a 40-character hexadecimal SHA-1 hash. This behavior is associated with the 'Plugin4Shell' technique, which exploits how some git implementations prioritize matching ref names over target commit objects, enabling an attacker to manipulate or swap code in automated systems or AI coding agents that rely on SHA-pinning.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
1 month ago
004
Detects the creation of a Git branch where the branch name matches the pattern of a 40-character hexadecimal SHA-1 hash. This behavior is associated with the 'Plugin4Shell' technique, which exploits how some git implementations prioritize matching ref names over target commit objects, enabling an attacker to manipulate or swap code in automated systems or AI coding agents that rely on SHA-pinning.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
1 month ago
003
Detects login attempts to source code repositories and developer tooling (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Slack, Visual Studio Code) originating from unmanaged or non-compliant devices, excluding traffic originating from known corporate network ranges.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
1 month ago
000
Detects repository activity involving the 'FETCH_HEAD' reference, which often indicates automated fetching, local caching, or potential attempts to manipulate or inspect the state of a Git repository during reconnaissance or post-exploitation activities.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
1 month ago
001
This rule detects Git repository modification events (such as pushes, branch creation, or reference creation) where the reference name matches a hexadecimal string (often indicative of a specific commit hash being pushed as a branch or tag) and the host is not github.com. This may indicate suspicious repository activity or interaction with non-standard or unauthorized code repositories.
avatar
Ibrahim Saud@tektrix
avatar
Detections.ai Community
1 month ago
000
Detects anomalous, large-scale cloning or mirroring of code repositories combined with targeted access to infrastructure-as-code configuration files (e.g., .tfvars, .tfstate) or automated exfiltration of CI/CD build artifacts. This behavior is indicative of an adversary attempting to exfiltrate proprietary source code or sensitive secrets stored within repositories.
avatar
Arnold Chan@slaz
avatar
Hunters
2 months ago
003
Detects the creation of git branches named as a 40-character hexadecimal string, which corresponds to a full commit SHA. This naming convention is a technique used to perform checkout-hijacking, potentially allowing an attacker to override files or deceive automated processes that rely on branch-specific logic.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
avatar
Detections.ai Community
1 month ago
000
Detects anomalous, large-scale cloning or mirroring of code repositories combined with targeted access to infrastructure-as-code configuration files (e.g., .tfvars, .tfstate) or automated exfiltration of CI/CD build artifacts. This behavior is indicative of an adversary attempting to exfiltrate proprietary source code or sensitive secrets stored within repositories.
avatar
Arnold Chan@slaz
Defender - KQL
2 months ago
002
Detects anomalous, large-scale cloning or mirroring of code repositories combined with targeted access to infrastructure-as-code configuration files (e.g., .tfvars, .tfstate) or automated exfiltration of CI/CD build artifacts. This behavior is indicative of an adversary attempting to exfiltrate proprietary source code or sensitive secrets stored within repositories.
avatar
Arnold Chan@slaz
avatar
Detections.ai Community
2 months ago
002
Detects anomalous, large-scale cloning or mirroring of code repositories combined with targeted access to infrastructure-as-code configuration files (e.g., .tfvars, .tfstate) or automated exfiltration of CI/CD build artifacts. This behavior is indicative of an adversary attempting to exfiltrate proprietary source code or sensitive secrets stored within repositories.
avatar
Arnold Chan@slaz
avatar
Midnight Slayer
2 months ago
001
Detects anomalous, large-scale cloning or mirroring of code repositories combined with targeted access to infrastructure-as-code configuration files (e.g., .tfvars, .tfstate) or automated exfiltration of CI/CD build artifacts. This behavior is indicative of an adversary attempting to exfiltrate proprietary source code or sensitive secrets stored within repositories.
avatar
Arnold Chan@slaz
avatar
Detection & Hunting Community
2 months ago
001
This rule detects potential data exfiltration by monitoring for anomalous user behavior across integrated SaaS applications. It flags accounts that perform high-frequency read, search, or view activities across three or more monitored SaaS platforms (Confluence, Jira, Slack, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, or Bitbucket) within a 5-minute window, followed immediately by an upload or post activity to an external, non-integrated domain.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
Bharat Cyber Guardians
3 months ago
101
This rule detects potential data exfiltration by monitoring for anomalous user behavior across integrated SaaS applications. It flags accounts that perform high-frequency read, search, or view activities across three or more monitored SaaS platforms (Confluence, Jira, Slack, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, or Bitbucket) within a 5-minute window, followed immediately by an upload or post activity to an external, non-integrated domain.
avatar
Ankit Mehta@Secvyn
avatar
Detections.ai Community
3 months ago
301
Detects network traffic to the specific 'amos-trading' Bitbucket repository used by a threat actor to host trojanized STX RAT installers. This activity is indicative of a supply chain compromise where malicious software is distributed via a legitimate-looking source.
avatar
Ethan Andrews@eandrews
avatar
Federal Signal Detections
5 months ago
1011
Detects when secret scanning rule is deleted for the project or repository.
avatar
SigmaHQ Detections@sigmaHQ
avatar
SigmaHQ
6 months ago
404
Detects Bitbucket global secret scanning rule deletion activity.
avatar
SigmaHQ Detections@sigmaHQ
avatar
SigmaHQ
6 months ago
003
Detects Bitbucket global SSH access configuration changes.
avatar
SigmaHQ Detections@sigmaHQ
avatar
SigmaHQ
6 months ago
301
Detects changes to the bitbucket audit log configuration.
avatar
SigmaHQ Detections@sigmaHQ
avatar
SigmaHQ
6 months ago
001
Detects when a secret scanning allowlist rule is added for projects.
avatar
SigmaHQ Detections@sigmaHQ
avatar
SigmaHQ
6 months ago
001
Page 1 of 4