Ibrahim Saud
@tektrixIndiaCompletionist
2 followers18,458 downloads7,116 copies47 likes38,534 views
11,679 detections
Filters
Last updated
All Time
Detection languages
3,760
1,874
1,586
966
944
Categories
4,878
3,246
1,529
1,303
1,122
Platforms
7,678
1,824
1,066
999
986
Products / Services
2,963
1,768
1,278
953
798
MITRE Techniques
3,615
3,555
2,488
1,474
1,186
CVEs
36
27
26
25
23
IDS Classtypes
360
113
38
24
24
IDS Protocols
315
114
93
47
10
Detects command-line execution patterns that exhibit hallmark traits of LLM-generated code, such as overly verbose and explanatory comments, appearing alongside common obfuscation or decoding primitives (e.g., base64, iex, eval). This combination suggests the use of AI to assist in creating decoy logic or burying malicious payloads within legitimate-appearing scripts to evade detection.
Detects high-velocity, automated authentication failures originating from a single IP against internet-exposed management interfaces. The rule monitors for a rapid sequence of distinct user accounts being targeted in a short time window, indicating AI-driven or automated credential stuffing/brute force activity targeting VPNs or firewalls.
Detects a two-stage activity: first, the potential unauthorized reading or access of LLM provider API keys from files, environment variables, or command-line arguments; and second, the subsequent use of those same credentials to authenticate to LLM provider APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure, Bedrock) from a different, unrecognized source IP address, indicating potential credential theft and session hijacking.
Detects bulk insertions or content updates into vector databases, document stores, or knowledge bases that contain suspected instruction-override, jailbreak, or role-hijacking phrases, particularly when performed by unauthenticated or unknown identities.
Detects high-volume, systematic querying of LLM inference endpoints, which may indicate unauthorized model extraction, distillation attempts, or targeted data exfiltration from an LLM.
Detects a suspicious pattern of activity where a single source IP performs network reconnaissance followed by rapid-fire failed authentication attempts against multiple distinct hosts within a short time window. This behavior is indicative of automated, agentic AI-driven offensive tooling rather than manual activity.
Detects command-line execution patterns that exhibit hallmark traits of LLM-generated code, such as overly verbose and explanatory comments, appearing alongside common obfuscation or decoding primitives (e.g., base64, iex, eval). This combination suggests the use of AI to assist in creating decoy logic or burying malicious payloads within legitimate-appearing scripts to evade detection.
Detects high-velocity, automated authentication failures originating from a single IP against internet-exposed management interfaces. The rule monitors for a rapid sequence of distinct user accounts being targeted in a short time window, indicating AI-driven or automated credential stuffing/brute force activity targeting VPNs or firewalls.
Detects a two-stage activity: first, the potential unauthorized reading or access of LLM provider API keys from files, environment variables, or command-line arguments; and second, the subsequent use of those same credentials to authenticate to LLM provider APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure, Bedrock) from a different, unrecognized source IP address, indicating potential credential theft and session hijacking.
Detects anomalous, chained execution patterns initiated by AI agents integrated with Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. The rule identifies a multi-stage sequence involving the invocation of browser automation tools followed by shell execution and subsequent outbound network activity, potentially indicating an AI-driven attack chaining filesystem, shell, or cloud-API access in an unauthorized manner.
Page 293 of 1168